It's notable by viewing the user edit history that pretty much all edits of the last 6 years have been reverted. Seems to be a candidate to for a non-expiring block application.
osm.org/user/%CE%93%CE%B9%CE%AC%CE%BD%CE%BD%CE%B7%CF%82%204/history#map=2/-7.4/23.6

Hi,

When changing way lays it's really advisable to go by the 'newest' imagery. Clarity is prehistoric to say the least and offset badly is is warned for in other editors. Previous position of Via Fontana restored.

PLUS 9 warnings of non-standard taggings in the change set summary.

Hi,

You touched many things in a very large area in a single edit session which is ill advised. For that see wiki on change set '(recommended) best practise' to keep it compact: osm.wiki/Changeset

Your changes include 16 warnings per the edit summary above. It would be good if you resolve these too like the other 12 issues you fixed.

Happy mapping.

hi,

I "Anello delle Bregonze n.11": Fixme="Effettuare revert"

Assolutemente. Il mappatore che lo ha inserito non ha risposto a più messaggi.. Doppio 'highway'. Se reali, i tag dovrebbero essere spostati nei modi preesistenti come relazione di percorso (nuove route relation).

ciao

Hi,

I've done that before and then the original mapper who left these tagless ways removed the tags again.. Think pedestrian tag on pedestrian area is the better tagging as it render it makes them invisible.

ciao

cheers.

Hi,

moi encore, I've gone ahead and deleted the double/triple path ways leaving those that had hiking relations and actual grading tags. Also moved a query put on a name tag to a fixme note. Link the CS back to this discussion.

ciao ciao

Hi,

That's what gscholz wrote to him with wiki link. JDI on OSM does not work. The track needs to stay for vehicle routing, none are allowed on 'path'.

Hi Dino

What about the double and even triple at eastern end of path-path-track mapped smack on top of each other?

Track #180153859
Path #1104928659
Path #1104928660

Think the oldest way needs to stay and if there are any legit CAI tags they needs transferring to said oldest.

ciao.

PS Fulvio has done multiple of these overlapping way mappings, a popular thing with multiple trail mappers, not seemingly responding to any message from you and gscholz. I've been unsuccessful too to get any reaction from others, not even PM.

SekeRob

Hi, clear as mud to me

ruins use 111 thousand
ruin use 817

You change 4 from ruin to ruins and cover 4 continents in doing so in one edit set. Kindly do this on a less ' global' basis, 813 to go, in fact JOSM has an option to save by objects and nodes 1 by 1 wholly automatic and it will just be seen on a local by local basis. See save screen Settings > Upload each object individually, Please use :O!

Using turbooverpass launched from taginfo chttps://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=ruin, the tool will show you a more localised basis where this could be updated, but does not have to be since the data consumers will know that ruin and ruins is the same thing.

MGIA
ciao

When you travel you can still upload which is pretty much from anywhere. StreetComplete can be set to do that ;o)

Not a copy / paste, a result of mapping in the same area, moving a tile and not realising all current data was loaded into JOSM for that tile, then mapping the same thing again. In that big thumbs down for JOSM not doing that automatically.

cheerio

Hi,

Do you really need to do this 'in situ' Streetcomplete quest completing covering half of Europe each time. Your edits push all other local edits from the active history view. Not good. StreetComplete is for local survey updating, NOT updating from memory which is very surely failing many a time.

For your awareness, here's a wiki discussing 'best practiise' on sizes of change set areas covered in the single save, with special attention called on for the chapter "Geographical size of changesets".

osm.wiki/Changeset

Ciao and thanks for being a good OSM citizen.

Cooment falsely copied from previous edit set, this actually landcover qualifications on the Majella.

Hi

You had not noticed the forest had disappeared from render view in OSM Carto? Duly correctly, per textbook with osm.org/changeset/127566447#map=16/45.5859/10.3988

Hi

Non avevi notato che la foresta era scomparsa dal rendering in OSM Carto? In modo debitamente corretto, secondo il metodo di mappatura dei libri di testo con osm.org/changeset/127566447#map=16/45.5859/10.3988

Ciao

Forgot source tag: Esri World Imagery

And when you do go international, please in Englisch, Bitteschön
ciao

Hi,

I've done some role clean up on the river beds passing thru the forest which effectively is nowhere inner, it's all outer as nowhere a single forest wraps around the river by 360 degrees.

As for the river bed sections, I would propose to retag that from scree to shingle: See wiki osm.wiki/Tag:natural=shingle

ciao

We don't speak Czech in Italy, either Italian or English which is the common language on OSM most all comprehend, many actually preferring to post their CS comments in English which is what StreetComplete does, always.

Anyway, if you change tags on ways then you should have also correct the relations. NOW the 2 cycle routes on these ways are broken. At the very minimum the tags should be "bicycle=dismount", NOT no. There's also tags to tell the cyclist to bicycle=use_sidepath, opposite side of road etc. "Varie in Lesolo" is not an explanation. Tell other mappers the why.

ciao

Hi

Why did you change bicycle=yes to no when this way is part of a cycle route relation?