I don't know whether you have seen any new sign with route numbers in them. If there are none, remove them.

Correction: [Santa Teresita and Taal, Batangas] add land use, creeks, and barangay boundaries, clean up local road network, remap and realign buildings/roads, delete suspicious POIs copied from Google Maps, lowered implied speed limit of rural local road

QBX is already tagged as proposed, and the construction tags you're referring is on a bypass under construction (the Pagbilao Bypass project).

Better use road names on the via tags. Even if we got route numbers, only a few recognize them. I'm fine with using city/town names on that tag (as long they're on the signs).

Why did this one have a large bounding box?

I think this edit has just messed up bus route relations, and needs to be fixed immediately. Is that accidental?

Hi.

As far as I know, default speed limits for national highways are rather between 40 or 80, per Land Transportation and Traffic Act/Republic Act 4136 (unless signs or local traffic ordinance sets a different limit), but I don't know yet if the national default speed has been lowered from what was written in RA 4136. Can you clarify this?

Wrong comment, should rather say [Bustos and San Rafael, Bulacan] add future second carriageway for Plaridel Bypass Road, fix service roads. Sources: Bing;Maxar Standard Imagery;

The proposed= tags on the sections of Anthony Henday doesn't seem to be the cause why routing in OSRM doesn't work, but rather due to all ways on the Highway 216 relation tagged as "forward". Fixed it on a later changeset.

Additional source: Department of Education, CY 2013 Public Schools Masterlist

Node for Entrepeneur Bank in Calamba accidentally deleted. Restored here: osm.org/changeset/78834103

[Edmonton, AB] add dollar store at WEM Phase IV

[Edmonton, AB] add other shops on WEM Phases III and IV

[Edmonton, AB] add other shops and restaurants inside WEM

Additional source: DepEd 2013 Public Schools Masterlist.

[Edmonton, AB] add buffet restaurant

"National Road" is the most common name for the sections of Manila South Road/Maharlika Highway, so do not change that without discussing it.

I would strongly disagree with the roads in question being trunk. "Trunk" in the Canadian context is generally used for highways designated part of the National Highway System. Did you got them tagged as trunk based on the US definition rather than the Canadian one?

I would better think handling such conditions with tracktype=3 (mostly solid) rather than a demotion to track.

Are you referring to the latest updates from the Southwest Calgary Ring Road project website (http://www.swcrrproject.com/) by Alberta Transportation and the project's private contractors?