TagaSanPedroAko's Comments
Changeset | Kada | Komentaras |
---|---|---|
163112407 | prieš 5 mėnesius | The Batangas-Mindoro Interconnection will be a 230 kV line, or is the voltage changed in the latest TDP? The change to 500 kV lacks a source. What I can find from the updated NGCP TDP is that the line will be 230 kV. |
156117296 | prieš 11 mėnesių | the existing classifications are fine according to existing network, so why would you upgrade them to trunk? reverting these changes as well as to the highways on west coast. |
155432948 | prieš 11 mėnesių | to be honest, the descriptive naming scheme as described in the wiki has been raising much controversy. It was included in the original proposal, but many have been calling out the use of descriptive naming over the years. If the bus route has an official route name, will insist on using the actual name instead. |
154627390 | prieš 12 mėnesių | As for the GenSan-CDO corridor, would say most traffic will pass thru Kidapawan instead of bypassing it, and for the Bukidnon segment, consider Sayre as the main route (the route via Talakag is fairly remote, would keep primary for the route there as an less favorable alternative). As for Davao-Valencia, not sure, but I would assign one trunk route only (maybe most traffic would pass via Maramag, but would check DPWH traffic data if that holds true). |
154627390 | prieš 12 mėnesių | Actually, most of the reclassification is based on their official designation. Most of the roads in question reclassified are tertiary national and provincial roads, usually indicator of lower importance. Haven't checked measured traffic data though. |
151532086 | prieš 12 mėnesių | All those barangays marked as quarter are urban barangays, so why you are reverting them back to village? It blurs urban-rural distinction and also causes visual noise. |
150472502 | prieš daugiau nei 1 metus | this is not a bad change, this just restored POIs and some roads deleted in a related edit. |
145478822 | prieš daugiau nei 1 metus | This was a follow-up of changes in Ontario that removed a lot of those supposed exit "names". Many of the names are not in any way legit exit names; these are just attempts to force destination info to show on the map (the likes of "A-20/Vaudreuil-Dorion/Toronto" is particularly an eyesore). The only legitimately named interchanges I can find for Quebec is Turcot and Décarie in Montreal. (traduction automatique en français) Il s'agissait d'un suivi des changements survenus en Ontario qui ont supprimé un grand nombre de ces supposés « noms » de sortie. La plupart de ces noms ne sont en aucun cas des noms de sortie légitimes ; ce ne sont que des tentatives pour forcer l'affichage des informations de destination sur la carte (le type "A-20/Vaudreuil-Dorion/Toronto" est particulièrement une horreur). Les seuls échangeurs légitimement nommés que je puisse trouver pour le Québec sont Turcot et Décarie à Montréal. |
126636423 | prieš daugiau nei 1 metus | just a note, Bing airphoto around the area is badly offset with GPX tracks. I restored the previous road alignment for part of Aguinaldo Highway and Anabu Road based on Esri coverage which is better aligned with GPX. |
134216339 | maždaug prieš 2 metus | That doesn't matter. The feature is in North America: German is not generally used there. So, like you're applying what you're doing in Europe assuming North America does the same with those at the border. Please stop. |
134216339 | maždaug prieš 2 metus | Americans or Canadians who don't speak German will have no idea what an LKW means. Please stop adding these labels. Those labels are also descriptive; the fact a lane or parking is used by trucks is already highlighted by the hgv= tag. (strojový překlad do češtiny) Američané nebo Kanaďané, kteří nemluví německy, nebudou mít ponětí, co znamená LKW. Přestaňte prosím přidávat tyto štítky. Tyto štítky jsou také popisné; skutečnost, že jízdní pruh nebo parkoviště využívají kamiony, je již zvýrazněna značkou hgv=. |
128918670 | maždaug prieš 2 metus | similarly with Bay-Calauan, unless the towers have been removed, do not delete it yet. |
129052858 | maždaug prieš 2 metus | unless the towers and the power line itself have been removed, do not delete it yet. you said the mentioned line segment will be retired, but the structures are still there. reverting this, but tagging this as voltage=0 (i.e. deenergized). |
136783441 | maždaug prieš 2 metus | reverted this. full name of M.H. del Pilar can be handled with name:etymology instead of having this falsely expanded because you unfamiliar with the name. |
136623658 | maždaug prieš 2 metus | expressway regulation do not apply to the sections you reclassified, and these even have bus stops. undoing this. already undone change around NLEx Karuhatan. apply motorway_link only if expressway regulation applies. |
134218959 | maždaug prieš 2 metus | Looks like you used the wrong Metro brand for Metro Supermarket or Super Metro. Please be careful as the Metro brand is still not in NSI. Morag sayop ang imong gigamit nga tatak sa Metro para sa Metro Supermarket o Super Metro. Palihug pag-amping kay ang Metro brand wa pa sa NSI. |
129581132 | prieš daugiau nei 2 metus | still no idea. The lines in question are carried on typical pole (13.5-16.5 m), so why you got them all tagged 115 kV? It's a terrible mistake. |
129581132 | prieš daugiau nei 2 metus | 115 kV on a distribution line? |
130934958 | prieš daugiau nei 2 metus | I don't think so, especially for the Lucena-bound buses. Where did you get that night-time routing through Poblacion/daytime routing through bypass in Candelaria? |
130929281 | prieš daugiau nei 2 metus | Thanks. It's almost correct, except that segment through Santa Maria. Haven't TTP a while to use recent Sentinel-2 image. |