Those ways you're mentioning are emergency median openings; these used to be tagged as normal motorway_link, but that's a mistake so far. Crossovers on such roads are normally for emergency access only (and closed), but there used some of those used for U-turns to a nearby exit due to an incomplete interchange.

Highly urbanized cities outside Metro Manila are usually tagged admin_level=6 like provinces. Baguio is a HUC administratively independent from Benguet.

No problem, but the exit name's aren't real ones either; they're merely destination info on signage being forced to appear on main map.

I don't think so from how some routers handle them. Take for example OSRM, which equals trunk with motorway-like roads/expressways in Western Europe or North America, that basically makes them not usable for bike and pedestrian routing unless you tag them explicitly (as like what is being done in the US as they move from a usage of trunk based on construction to one based on importance).

I'm currently working with speed limit verification on the northwest quadrant (roughly north of 16 Ave and west of Deerfoot) as well as downtown. Seems like 40 mostly applies to local streets, not the collectors. It's very different from what I found in Edmonton where I did a similar change there months after Calgary reduced its default to 40 as well; even collectors got 40 unless signs are posted.

You (or somebody local) can take care of most of the inner roads, but thanks for providing the link to verify speeds, and I can help finding where it's either 40 or 50, especially in downtown (I can remember finding 50 on the larger streets) or some neighbourhoods where I've been. I'm from the Edmonton area by the way. Edmonton also has a similar verification tool for finding where it's 40; Edmonton adapted a 40 km/h default three months after Calgary did (May 31, 2021)

Well, that's actually a voltage standardized by the IEC, see the table on key=voltage on OSM Wiki, but, yes, it's quite common to be referred to as 25 kV and lines do get tagged with that value here too instead of the more precise nominal value. It's much like the voltage of power supplied to our homes which is nominally 120 V but commonly referred to as 110 V.

I just looked at the Moose Jaw end, and you might be correct, the problem being that more details are needed for the substation and some lines ending at the wrong place. There are also some lines that have been removed.

@DP24PH Heto ka na naman. You're trying to help, but why go whole lengths to ask LGU? The issue is very simple: locate the node in Poblacion or busier area[s]? Panapaan is also busy with SM around, but I think it's Zapote.

@DP24PH It's more or less clear the Zapote-Talaba-Niog area is the ''de facto'' downtown, as the most built-up and the end of Alabang-Zapote Kabila. This edit moved the city node to around SM Bacoor, but to me, that isn't the best place as more busier area is Zapote-Talaba.

Isn't the first place you'll think of Bacoor as the Zapote-Talaba-Niog area?

@Open Paint Maps You have been blocked for not heeding your previous block. Intimidating mappers who revert you will only make your block longer!

Unless they have clear reopening date, better keep it as is.

@dasmarinas_mapper I already asked the Data Working Group for this user to be blocked and most edits reverted. I managed to review and revert/correct this user's edits, and he's now blackmailing me through diary posts. His presence is a complete headache.

Better clean your mess with the classifications, and please refrain from messing with classifications. Some changes fine, but others questionable. Better focus on other things aside from road classifications, and use good changeset comments that explain what you done. Also, please change username (it's deceptively similar to OpenStreetMap)

Please be more specific with changeset comments. Completely have no idea why you've been here in the first place other than to say "Version Map Paints" in every edit.

Reverted downgrade to trunk, now there is more convincing case for that. Route via Tanauan proposed, but I readily oppose it. Route possibility via Nasugbu would be way too long, so conceding with retaining Dasma-Tagaytay-Lemery-Batangas City trunk

We can settle with that for now. I understand, but I also have objections to Tagaytay-Tanauan becoming trunk, as to leave Santa Rosa-Tagaytay as the only primary in the area. Well, I see now why we should a Dasma-Batangas City link aside from a route via Calamba. I can revert it to how you wanted it.

FYI, if you want further discussion, you may want to register at talk-ph at https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph . I already opened a discussion about it, but since I realized you may be right, I'll be undoing my changes.

Adding to my counterarguments I posted on related changeset that created it, while two parallel trunks can be possible (e.g. Maharlika Highway and Andaya Highway between Tabugon, Santa Elena, Camarines Norte and Sipocot, CamSur, and Maharlika Highway and Route 51 between Santiago and Tuguegarao), it is not convincing unless there is a good deal of primary in between (something that has been already reduced as the Dasma-Batangas via Lemery route got trunk). The pairings of EDSA and Roxas Boulevard, Road 10 and C-4 may appear to be one, but is can be better seen as a ring or belt around a very densely populated area, and serves two different corridors within Metro Manila.

Just a note, I deleted the HA27 relation and remaining references to it since it actually doesn't exist. Also rollbacked the upgrade west of Aguinaldo Highway (discounting jog at Pasong Camachile, Open Canal is too narrow and won't consider it good candidate for primary. Also, road primarily for local traffic.)