'Hallo HV2023,

Ik heb deze changeset teruggedraaid omdat deze de omtrek van gebouwen veranderd. In nederland worden alle gebouwen geimporteerd uit BAG. het is niet de bedoeling om gebouwen te verwijderen of de omtrek te wijzigen. het is ook niet de bedoeling om gebouwen op te splitsen in onderdelen zoals huis en garage. Ook zag ik dat er in iedergeval 1 overlappend gebouw was. Zoals ik al eerder heb verteld is dit niet de bedoeling.

Groeten,
Taya'

osm.org/changeset/143609226

'Hallo HV2023,

Ik heb deze changeset teruggedraaid omdat deze de omtrek van gebouwen veranderd. In nederland worden alle gebouwen geimporteerd uit BAG. het is niet de bedoeling om gebouwen te verwijderen of de omtrek te wijzigen. het is ook niet de bedoeling om gebouwen op te splitsen in onderdelen zoals huis en garage. Ook zag ik dat er in iedergeval 1 overlappend gebouw was. Zoals ik al eerder heb verteld is dit niet de bedoeling.

Groeten,
Taya'

osm.org/changeset/143609226

Hallo HV2023,

Nogmaals. Zou je er op willen letten dat de naturals die je plaatst niet overlappen met al bestaande naturals. Zet die aub in of in een MP relatie, of tussen bestaande closed ways.

Verder vraag ik je ook om Aub iets betere changeset comments te gebruiken. Its als "aanpassingen terchelling" is vrij generiek en zegt niets over wat deze changeset doet.

Vriendelijke groet, Taya.

Hallo HV2023,

Zorg er aub voor dat naturals niet met elkaar overlappen. het zand dat jij hier hebt toegevoegd overlapte met de kwelder, de scrub en het stukje bos.

Groeten,
Taya

Hallo HV2023,

Ik heb dit weer verwijderd. Houten plateau's zijn geen gebouwen. Ook is het niet de bedoeling om gebouwen te overlappen.

Groeten,
Taya

A lot of vandalism happened. Someone tried deleting all of Isreal and made a huge mess in the process. Dragging all sorts of things around.
the DWG is currently in the process of restoring things.

Some info on what happened here:
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/vandalism-and-blocks-in-israel/105176
and here: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/how-about-limit-new-accounts/101656/241

Eerste keer dat ik aan snelwegen zit, controle of alles hier goed gaat zou gewaardeerd worden. Gaat voornamelijk om osm.org/way/1217281061

I will keep that in mind for the future. Thank you for the information.

As nice as it would be to have a single reliable and up-to-date source of truth for coastline data. the OS maps arent it.

osm.wiki/Ordnance_Survey_OpenData
The wiki page already states:
"1. Don't assume the OS data is either correct or up to date. Use it as a guide and additional resource for your mapping, not a replacement."

In addition to that and like I said before. The MHWL data contains plenty of errors and are years out of date in some places.

To show a select few examples:

Ghost islands:
https://media.discordapp.net/attachments/782593988611014676/1163366536824758342/image.png
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/718028525021429832/1163390964262502430/image.png

Missing islands:
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/718028525021429832/1163363295357583440/image.png
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/718028525021429832/1163363291066806292/image.png
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/718028525021429832/1163395822243823686/image.png

Out-of-date coastlines:
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/718028525021429832/1163364623404236800/image.png
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/718028525021429832/1163364622347272212/image.png
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/718028525021429832/1163364621286113340/image.png

All of these are very clearly in error and show that the OS data isn't foolproof and should not be relied on as the sole source of coastline data.

Well thats just rude. Undoing someone's work because they're not using the data source you want them to.

So there is no OS data available thats more accurate and up to date? Thats a shame. I'll try looking at the OS maps a bit more often. But I'm not going to blindly trust it when I have more detailed and more recent visual imagery available to me.

As for the admin boundaries. I map terrain, things that exist "on the ground". Right now I try not to touch them and basically pretend they're not there. Which sometimes leads to inconsistencies when editing pieces of coastline that have admin boundaries attached to them. So if you have a suggestion there, as to whats the best way to deal with those cases, that would be welcome.

I've tried using the OS OpenMap Streetview/Local maps in the past, but have found them to be pretty outdated and innacurate at times. Especially near Saltmarshes. So I've mostly been using satellite imagery.

Its not too bad. You can make pretty accurate guesses, especially when you're using multiple different layers. But it does always have leave amount of error yeah.

If you have a more up-to-date or accurate coastline imagery URL I could use, that would be highly appreciated.

Sincerely,
Taya

I mostly just use bing imagery. But esri wayback serves as a good backup tool sometimes. Plus its great for determining low tide features.

Je hebt gelijk. Was denk ik nog niet helemaal wakker. Zal dit morgen even aanpassen als niemand mij voor is.

Seems to be some sort of bird feeder you can pay for? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_-SQ-0JIm4o&t=28047s

So just some low effort crypto spam that can be removed.

I map a random island for fun and come back 3 days later to see a dozen new changesets and many additional details mapped. Impressive.

Met deze changeset kan osm.org/note/3667583 ook op resolved gezet worden. Nice

reverted

osm.org/changeset/141922554

reverted

osm.org/changeset/141922554

reverted

osm.org/changeset/141922554