Reverted. Please do not replace road segments with your SEO spam

osm.org/changeset/150183289

Hi,

These sectors you've added are not individual buildings, so using the building=* tag is not correct. You could perhaps change them to landuse=residential area and replace the exisiting landuse with a "place=village + name=Roy Hill Village" node.

Sincerely,
Taya

Reverted. OSM is not the place to do test edits.

osm.org/changeset/150142511

Hallo David,

Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.

Groeten,
Taya

In this changeset you dragged a highway node over a kilometre away. Please be more dilligent when editing the map. I have reverted this changeset

osm.org/changeset/149962378

If you see a piece of highway inbetween 2 other access=private highways, then it is clear that only adding bicycle=no is not sufficient.

reverted incorrectly added access tags

osm.org/changeset/149962095

reverted incorrectly added access tags

osm.org/changeset/149962095

reverted incorrectly added access tags

osm.org/changeset/149962095

reverted incorrectly added access tags

osm.org/changeset/149962095

Access tags are only to be used for legal access. Unless there is a sign prohibiting cyclists from cycling ehre it should not be tagged as bicycle=no

Please use access=private if the access is private. Access=no means no one can use this path

Why did you add bicycle=no here? I'm pretty sure you are allowed to cycle here

Ziet er goed uit!

Hallo S3mT3x2024,

Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.

Ik heb ook de namen die je deze stukjes gras hebt gegeven weer verwijderd. bij OSM geven we alleen namen aan dingen als ze ook daadwerkelijk zo heten, aub dus geen beschrijfende namen.

Groeten,
Taya

I have some concerns about the source of this edit. You added details to the wreck such as railings, gates, the mast and more.

What source did you use to map the titanic like that?

Hi, I just stumbled upon osm.org/way/1043474699

Is this correctly mapped? It only has a source tag and is not part of any relation

Sincerely,
Taya

I have done a timely revert of this changeset in osm.org/changeset/149944704

Sincerely,
Taya

Changeset comment should have been: Removed incorrect speed limits.

Then something must have gone wrong. In this changeset and in osm.org/changeset/149890682 you deleted all the roads.

I reverted the deletions and removed the speed limits and names. Could you check whether everything is correct now? https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=149898400

Sincerely,
Taya