Velox's Comments
Changeset | 日時 | コメント |
---|---|---|
92433311 | 4年以上前 | trigeo, could you please add more information about what data source you had used while deleted relation 6207114? |
80519484 | 5年以上前 | Thank you Pedro!
|
80273583 | 5年以上前 | Awesome. I added turn restrictions on Valencia / Page / Franklin St, they were missing. Also added bus and taxi = yes to every segment that has changes. |
80273583 | 5年以上前 | Also there is few more turn restrictions not mapped yet. I can map them if it is ok. |
80273583 | 5年以上前 | Hi! I am not the person that could confirm your decision on motor_vehicle=no, but from Navigation perspective, it is the best solution. It is good to add bus= and taxi=yes to the street. Can you do this?
"I actually drove on Market last night and they had already changed many of the routes/signage to reflect the bus/taxi-only lanes"
|
76242369 | 5年以上前 | Yeah, Bing links are not very obvious. You can find this sign here: https://binged.it/33t6Sf3 As I can see on OSM, you already made this correct way, as it was in https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/76115879/ you reverted previously. |
76242369 | ほぼ6年前 | Hi ndm. In process of reviewing your reverts of 76204147 and 76115879 about Kingsway Ave, I found out that there IS a blue one way sign. It is located North of the Gillard Road and Kingsway Ave, from this and to Two Mile Hill Road Kingsway Avenue is one way. Please, check the length of one way segment if I'm right, it should be longer. Link to exact sign location: https://www.bing.com/maps?osid=c9193494-9048-44b4-9920-863c5674bf45&cp=51.461758802222164~-2.5236010587254896&lvl=19&dir=0&pi=12.94129&style=x&mo=z.0&v=2&sV=2&form=S00027&setMkt=en-US Thank you. |
76115879 | ほぼ6年前 | Exact location of the sign:
|
75516393 | ほぼ6年前 | Uh, are you talking about few highway=path that crossed this construction area? I was afraid to remove them, because I don't know their urgency. I can't detect any signs of this paths at the satellite imagery. Do you suggest just to connect this paths to existing networks? Just FYI, I've just noticed, that ID soes not not detect misconnections issues with highway=construction and highway=footway. |
75516393 | ほぼ6年前 | I'm not sure if I get the question correct, but these construction roads already connected to road network. I.e. this line: w733290744 I have no additional information about this place to do something more than just adding this construction roads. Feel free to improve this location. Phil. |
75822692 | ほぼ6年前 | Hi again. My edit was based on customer feedback and satellite imagery. It is clearly seen that this road is the only route to few houses/farmyards, so it is reasonable to assume that this road is used by regular cars. Tracks are not for everyday driving by car. So they are excluded for the normal car routing graph which is correct. Driveways to farmyards and houses are not tracks. They are not dominantly used for agricultural purposes. The amount of traffic for living outweighs by orders of magnitude. The postal services goes there, the kids go to school. Friends come and go. People drive to work. Tagging a driveway to a farm or to houses as an agricultural track makes them unreachable for most of today's car routing engines in their default settings. Thank you! |
75993202 | ほぼ6年前 | Hi!
|
75192900 | ほぼ6年前 | Hi! My bad, I did not pay attention to this. Thank you for your message. I will fix it. |
73882068 | ほぼ6年前 | name tag for Sea polygon removed
|
73881729 | ほぼ6年前 | way!691634038!4
|
73375057 | ほぼ6年前 | Mass deletion of existing roads.
|
73286226 | ほぼ6年前 | NODE: 6704362386
|
73262181 | ほぼ6年前 | this road is not a track, according to imagery
|
73242633 | ほぼ6年前 | This building looks offset.
|
72299366 | 約6年前 | No signs of real buildings at this location.
|