Address checks out https://www.felleskjopet.no/finn-oss/?selectedRegion=Troms

The sawmill is just historic data and isnt relevant to whether you can go there by boat or not. The question of mooring is current situation. mooring=no is probably the correct tag and sufficient to express the situation. However, it is already tagged "access=no" which probably covers the mooring situation quite well.

Path moved: osm.org/changeset/167079819

I fixed it for you.

Before adding or editing stops in Norway, please read this https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/bus-stops-in-norway-guide-for-understanding-current-data-and-reporting-problems/9560

However, it looks like this warrants an edit. I'll report this moved stop to Innlandstrafikk. The southbound stop now located on the inner road will be moved out to where you created your new stop (so please remove the new one)

This is not Morokulien. It's Morast. Morokulien is at the border.

If its in the same location, i would suggest just editing the POI, rather than deleting the old and creating the new. It makes it easier to see the history of the location. Not a huge problem, but its my suggestion :)

Not sure what was done here. Short term road closures should not result in map changes. For long term changes, the road (highway) should be retagged from, example: highway=primary to highway=construction;construction=primary.

Det er ingen gjennomkjøring lenger heller, fordi en del av wayen er delt av som footway. Dermed er det ikke mulig å kjøre gjennom. Ekstra tagging er overflødig.

This looks like an odd access tagging. Why is it not permitted to use this road? Is there a sign?

Very strange edit. Definitely not a correct edit. Looks like this edit reverts an old landcover import, but is botched. The lakes are removed, but its nodes are still there.

It seems too nonsensical to be malicious. I suspect the user has tried to revert something but entered the wrong changeset ID.

Få kommunen til å vedta deres navn og sette opp skilter.

Det er i seg ikke feil å navn på løypene, men spørsmålet er om andre kaller dem noe annet :) Er disse navnene etablert?

It was apperantly meant to be some sort of "hole" in the pier where you can see the ocean. See: osm.org/note/3822872#map=19/62.73655/7.16243

nei jeg bare gjorde en mass-edit for å ha litt sac_scale på stier på fjellet. grove estimat bare.

Sounds rather dutch.

Hej (gissar att du är svensk). Jag la till några fler byggnader och korrigerade placering av allt. osm.org/changeset/148207620

Vägnätet ligger rätt placerat så om du använder Bing eller andra flygfoton - justera först bilderna så dom matchar vägnätet. Då får du bättre träff med byggnader.
Jag har inte fixat vägnätet i hela Arvika än, men Eda ska vara spot on. Jobbar på Arvika :)

Om du är i området, lägg gärna på surface-data på vägarna. Asfalt/Grus (packad grusväg = compacted, lösgrus=gravel).

sounds like a case for motor_vehicle=private

Det är ju inget berg där så peak kan den inte ha. Alla element kan ha ele därimot. Utifrån namnet så bör ju den här vara natural=ridge.

I agree. Visual result matters for motivation. Let's hope you dont have to re-map too much after the recent (latest) volcanic activity. Keep up the awesome work.