Hi, and welcome to OpenStreetMap! Can you give a little more information on what you're trying to do here? Was an actual observation of the elevation here made?

Hi! Since you requested a review, I looked over your addition here. Looks great to me, no issues I can see! Thanks for your contributions.

Hi, and welcome to OpenStreetMap! Since you requested a review, I looked over your changes here. Looks great overall! One minor thing to keep in mind is that some roads that aren't regularly used may be better classified as "service roads". I think residential roads are generally used to describe routes that multiple parties might use to access their homes, for example something leading to a cul de sac.
Let me know if you have any questions, and thanks for your contribution!

Hi! Since you requested a review, I looked over your changes here. Looks good mostly, the only issue is that the crossing you added doesn't belong. Perhaps that was an accidental change? Anyway, thanks for your contributions, and welcome back to OSM!

Howdy! Since you requested a review, I looked over your changes here. Looks great to me, no issues I can see! Thanks for your contributions.

Hi, and welcome to OpenStreetMap! Since you requested a review, I looked over your changes here. Looks great overall! The only suggestion I have is that an auto parts shop should be tagged shop=car_parts instead of shop=car_repair. I went ahead and fixed that.
Anyway thanks for adding your business to the map and let me know if you have any questions!

Howdy! Looks like you actually did fix the Hays Lane on this one. Nice catch! In this case, we should still leave the road in place, but just recategorize it as a driveway and remove the name. I went ahead and did that!

Hi, and welcome to OpenStreetMap! Since you requested a review, I looked over your changes here. It looks like you didn't touch a Hays Lane, but only added a description= tag to the county line. Description should be used to describe some feature (if appropriate), not to describe a change you made. I went ahead and removed that tag. Let me know if that makes sense! Thanks for your contributions.

Gotcha! I added some more tags to that trail based on your description.

Thanks for your contribution! Since you added access=no, does that mean access is physically blocked, or it's legally not allowed, or did you intend some other meaning there?

Did you happen to get a look at the other mapped path just to the south there? Is there any way at all to get from the water lab to Sumac Drive, or nah?

Thanks for the survey! I remember following some buddies up this trail on mountain bikes like 6 or 8 years ago, it definitely seemed like a permissive/questionable access trail at that time so I'm glad you checked it. :)

Hi, did you see my comment on your other changeset regarding deletion? osm.org/changeset/149539578

Gotcha. Sounds good!

Hey there - Looking over this changeset, things look great overall. However, there are a couple of issues:
- The name tag should be used for the "common name" only, not to describe something. In this case, "Access Trail" isn't the actual name, so we should use other tags to describe it. (And you already did!)
- You added a "Foot Bridge" that should be tagged as a bridge foot path, not a road.
- In order for routing software to work correctly, things should be connected. In iD (the online OSM editor) that means dragging the ends of things like the foot bridge to "snap" to connect with other paths, roads, etc.

I went ahead and fixed those problems. Other than those, your other changes look super. Thanks again for your contributions!

Howdy! Since you requested a review, I looked over your changes here. Looks great to me, no complaints! Thanks for your contributions.

Howdy! Welcome to OSM. I went over your changes here and everything looks great to me! Thanks for your contributions.

Oh, looking over a few of your other changesets, looks like you're mostly doing more specific tagging anyway. Nice!

Hi, and welcome to OpenStreetMap! Since you requested a review, I looked over your changes here. Looks great! One suggestion I have is to tag the buildings more specifically, eg house, garage, etc. But that isn't strictly necessary, just easier to classify while adding them rather than coming through later, if that makes sense.
Let me know if you have any questions, and thanks for your contributions!

Hi! Your addition here has major problems with its tags. If you are the business owner, welcome to OSM! Please reply here or message me and we can get it fixed asap! If you are a marketing company creating accounts on behalf of clients, please review your process and learn more about OSM's tagging schema before making more edits, and use a company OSM account for all edits made by the same person. I've reverted your changes.

osm.org/changeset/149869391