One tip is that on the Edgemar Court intersection, you might consider adding a crossing there instead of connecting the sidewalk directly to the roadway.

Hi, and welcome to OpenStreetMap! Since you requested a review, I looked over your changes here. Looks great! Thanks for your contributions.

Hi, and welcome to OpenStreetMap! Since you requested a review, I looked over your changes here. Looks great to me! By "posted speed limit is incorrect", do you mean the OSM data was incorrect, or that the posted physical signage is incorrect?

Hi, and welcome to OpenStreetMap! Since you requested a review, I looked over your changes here. Everything looks good to me - Thanks for your contributions!

Nice! Thanks for that. I rode by here the other day and saw the new lane put in. (Really more of a bike shoulder, but I'll take it.)

Good tips. Sorry about that. I'll be honest, I find the changeset flags that OSMCha gives to be very trigger happy (tons of false positives) so I typically ignore them. But I think you're right that I can be more careful. Thanks for double checking!

Hi! Your addition here has major problems with its tags. If you are the business owner, welcome to OSM! Please reply here or message me and we can get it fixed! If you are a marketing company creating accounts on behalf of clients, please review your process and learn more about OSM's tagging schema before making more edits.

osm.org/changeset/149578789

Hi! Your addition here has major problems with its tags. If you are the business owner, welcome to OSM! Please reply here or message me and we can get it fixed! If you are a marketing company creating accounts on behalf of clients, please review your process and learn more about OSM's tagging schema before making more edits.

osm.org/changeset/149578659

Hi! Your addition here has major problems with its tags. If you are the business owner, welcome to OSM! Please reply here or message me and we can get it fixed! If you are a marketing company creating accounts on behalf of clients, please review your process and learn more about OSM's tagging schema before making more edits.

osm.org/changeset/149578649

Hi! Your addition here has major problems with its tags. If you are the business owner, welcome to OSM! Please reply here or message me and we can get it fixed! If you are a marketing company creating accounts on behalf of clients, please review your process and learn more about OSM's tagging schema before making more edits. Please provide a descriptive changeset comment, and don't include things like "keywords" or other SEO-related info.

osm.org/changeset/149578636

Huh, interesting. I thought that building to the north was just someone's house.

Just a side note that unfortunately we can't directly use Google Maps to improve OSM. (More info: osm.wiki/Google#Google_Maps_terms_of_use) - But, I think it's fine to use Google to find and navigate somewhere, then once we see it in person, add it to OSM. :) But I think you can leave this here and just double-check that it's correct once you get there, like you say!

Anyway, thanks for your contributions and thanks for clarifying on this!

Hmm, something seems wrong here. Is this a public park or just a general green area at these apartments? Are the buildings really contained within the official park boundary?

Hi! Can you double check the location here? It seems like this might be misplaced, but I could be wrong.

Howdy! In the future, please save your work in one area before moving on to the next. That makes it a lot easier for others to review your changes. More info: osm.wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Also, if this is a mechanical edit, did you follow the established guidelines? osm.wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct#Document_and_discuss_your_plans

Howdy! Since you requested a review, I looked over your changes. Looks great overall! The only suggestion I have is to avoid abbreviations in OSM. ("W" -> "West") That's because it's easy for computers to shorten words when necessary, but it can be harder to expand them when the longer form is more appropriate. Also, the house number part of an address should generally only contain the number. The first directional prefix should be part of the street. (Example: house number 1234; street East 100 North)

Let me know if you have any questions, and thanks for your contributions!!

Hi, and welcome to OpenStreetMap! In the future, please save your work before moving on to another area. That makes it much easier for others to review your work. More info: osm.wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Oh, also - see this short post on how to map nice curves: osm.org/user/Xvtn/diary/401601

(As you can see from the comments, people disagree on how many is too many. Lol)

Hi, and welcome to OpenStreetMap! Since you requested a review, I looked over your recent changesets. Looks great, nice job! The only suggestion I have is to not go too crazy on the "smoothing". If there are a really excessive amount of nodes along a way, it makes it slightly harder for later mappers to edit things if they end up changing.

How many is too many? The opinions vary quite a bit. In my opinion, we should use "as few as possible, but as many as necessary." But I'm sure you'll get a feel for what's best and develop your own opinion. :)

Let me know if you have any questions, and thanks for your contributions!

Nice! And regarding updates, it can really depend. If you clear your browser cache (ctrl+f5) you can usually see changes rendered on osm.org within a minute or two. For other data consumers, it can vary wildly, anywhere from a few mins (certain phone apps) to a few months or longer. (a vehicle's navigation unit) How are you looking at the map on your drive to work?

Howdy! In this case, my understanding is that the South prefix is correct for the street address. What was your reasoning for removing it?