OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
114901692 over 3 years ago

I think we need to either extend the trunk alignment all the way to the I-295 intersection in Maryland OR downgrade MD-210 to primary. It should be consistent end to end.

114945063 over 3 years ago

Good change to downgrade to primary here, but we should also eliminate the small trunk section on the overpass as well.

114764596 over 3 years ago

Hi, could you hold off on random changes to classification of dangling bits of highway like this? Please check your Slack messages. We would like to collaborate on defining what should be trunk on Virginia. Dangling trunk segments are inconsistent with the emerging national consensus.

114927321 over 3 years ago

Hi, could you please add more meaningful changeset comments?

114926068 over 3 years ago

Hello and welcome to OSM! Could you please add meaningful changeset comments so that we can understand what changes you're making?

114043146 over 3 years ago

I disagree with this edit to tag US-11 as trunk (and only partially at that). Since it parallels I-64, it should be of a lower importance, most likely primary.

114835575 over 3 years ago

Hi, thanks for working on RI parks. I had to fix a few things that were wrong on your edit of Buck Hill. First, I removed the tagging that you added on the relation member -- the tagging only needs to go on the parent relation. Also, there was a dangling extra segment on the polygon, which I removed and should have come up in the validator as an error.

Are you local to Rhode Island? If so, come chat with other RI mappers on the OSM US Slack, at https://osmus.slack.com/, channel #local-rhode-island

114824402 over 3 years ago

Please stop adding names to river areas, and please stop converting river areas to waterway=riverbank.

109705117 over 3 years ago

It would be helpful to be a bit more specific in your changeset comment so we can understand what it is that you've fixed :)

114715077 over 3 years ago

Do not delete features with the promise of future replacement. If you're going to replace objects, do it in a single changeset so that the data is never missing. This changeset needs to be reverted.

114743974 over 3 years ago

Hi MusLak,

Several users have commented on your changesets, expressed concerns about some of your edits, or asked questions, and so far you haven't responded. In addition, I sent you a direct message through osm.org that wasn't responded to.

It is required that you communicate with other mappers, as this is a collaborative project that we all work together on. Please respond to these messages so that we can all work together :)

114701316 over 3 years ago

Hello, this changeset reverted a river area to the tag waterway=riverbank, which is no longer used by the US mapping community. Kindly tag river areas natural=water + water=river

114642720 over 3 years ago

Please respond to changeset comments.

114640110 over 3 years ago

I'm not sure, that got added before. I made a comment on the changeset where that got added.

94442022 over 3 years ago

Hi, where did the name Zzyzx Road come from? TIGER data has it as Arrowhead Trail so I'm wondering where the name change came from.

114640110 over 3 years ago

The OpenStreetMap community will not permit vandalism.

114640163 over 3 years ago

Please stop. The OpenStreetMap community will not permit this vandalism. Go to OpenGeoFiction if you want to create a fake map.

114640051 over 3 years ago

Please stop vandalizing the map. Your recent changesets have been reverted.

114568419 over 3 years ago

Please stop this vandalism immediately. The Data Working Group has been notified.

114602310 over 3 years ago

Also, I noticed that you put a name tag on river areas. River areas should have a blank name tag. Please see my presentation on river tagging for more details:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c5YwXDKGr2Y

Thanks, and happy mapping!