ZeLonewolf's Comments
Changeset | When | Comment |
---|---|---|
114901692 | over 3 years ago | I think we need to either extend the trunk alignment all the way to the I-295 intersection in Maryland OR downgrade MD-210 to primary. It should be consistent end to end. |
114945063 | over 3 years ago | Good change to downgrade to primary here, but we should also eliminate the small trunk section on the overpass as well. |
114764596 | over 3 years ago | Hi, could you hold off on random changes to classification of dangling bits of highway like this? Please check your Slack messages. We would like to collaborate on defining what should be trunk on Virginia. Dangling trunk segments are inconsistent with the emerging national consensus. |
114927321 | over 3 years ago | Hi, could you please add more meaningful changeset comments? |
114926068 | over 3 years ago | Hello and welcome to OSM! Could you please add meaningful changeset comments so that we can understand what changes you're making? |
114043146 | over 3 years ago | I disagree with this edit to tag US-11 as trunk (and only partially at that). Since it parallels I-64, it should be of a lower importance, most likely primary. |
114835575 | over 3 years ago | Hi, thanks for working on RI parks. I had to fix a few things that were wrong on your edit of Buck Hill. First, I removed the tagging that you added on the relation member -- the tagging only needs to go on the parent relation. Also, there was a dangling extra segment on the polygon, which I removed and should have come up in the validator as an error. Are you local to Rhode Island? If so, come chat with other RI mappers on the OSM US Slack, at https://osmus.slack.com/, channel #local-rhode-island |
114824402 | over 3 years ago | Please stop adding names to river areas, and please stop converting river areas to waterway=riverbank. |
109705117 | over 3 years ago | It would be helpful to be a bit more specific in your changeset comment so we can understand what it is that you've fixed :) |
114715077 | over 3 years ago | Do not delete features with the promise of future replacement. If you're going to replace objects, do it in a single changeset so that the data is never missing. This changeset needs to be reverted. |
114743974 | over 3 years ago | Hi MusLak, Several users have commented on your changesets, expressed concerns about some of your edits, or asked questions, and so far you haven't responded. In addition, I sent you a direct message through osm.org that wasn't responded to. It is required that you communicate with other mappers, as this is a collaborative project that we all work together on. Please respond to these messages so that we can all work together :) |
114701316 | over 3 years ago | Hello, this changeset reverted a river area to the tag waterway=riverbank, which is no longer used by the US mapping community. Kindly tag river areas natural=water + water=river |
114642720 | over 3 years ago | Please respond to changeset comments. |
114640110 | over 3 years ago | I'm not sure, that got added before. I made a comment on the changeset where that got added. |
94442022 | over 3 years ago | Hi, where did the name Zzyzx Road come from? TIGER data has it as Arrowhead Trail so I'm wondering where the name change came from. |
114640110 | over 3 years ago | The OpenStreetMap community will not permit vandalism. |
114640163 | over 3 years ago | Please stop. The OpenStreetMap community will not permit this vandalism. Go to OpenGeoFiction if you want to create a fake map. |
114640051 | over 3 years ago | Please stop vandalizing the map. Your recent changesets have been reverted. |
114568419 | over 3 years ago | Please stop this vandalism immediately. The Data Working Group has been notified. |
114602310 | over 3 years ago | Also, I noticed that you put a name tag on river areas. River areas should have a blank name tag. Please see my presentation on river tagging for more details:
Thanks, and happy mapping! |