ZeLonewolf's Comments

Changeset	When	Comment
80341048	almost 5 years ago	Hi, this relation appears to violate the guidelines at osm.wiki/Relations/Relations_are_not_Categories
93843174	almost 5 years ago	Hello, in this change, you had the place node assigned to a role of "outer" rather than "label" or "admin_centre". I've changed it to "admin_centre" but feel free to change that if not correct.
90986924	almost 5 years ago	Okay, should be all set for Rhode Island town/city boundaries! Are you local?
90986924	almost 5 years ago	Yes, I see what you are describing. admin_level is clearly not required on these boundary relation ways. Fortunately this is an easy fix.
90986924	almost 5 years ago	Let me investigate and get back to you. Thanks for alerting me.
93620032	almost 5 years ago	This looks great! Keep up the good work.
93571473	almost 5 years ago	Hello, yes, on further review, my edit was probably a step too far as protect_class=22 "cultural area" as probably a better characterization of these sites versus merely "historic". I have restored the original tagging and apologies for the churn.
93565271	almost 5 years ago	Yes, I understand your preference for protect_class=24 in this case.
93565271	almost 5 years ago	My bad, I researched this area on Wikipedia and it seemed like aboriginal_lands alone was a sufficient fit (which is also supported by renderers). I understand if you wish to revert the change.
93317991	almost 5 years ago	I attached the place nodes that had the same name as the surrounding boundary, ignoring subdivisions that didn't have a place node with a matching name. If that was not a correct assumption, my apologies and this changeset can easily be reverted.
93076553	almost 5 years ago	Hi, it looks like this change broke the town border at osm.org/relation/9157671
93033850	almost 5 years ago	I have added this information.
93005491	almost 5 years ago	Neat... but why not just "name" rather than "official_name"?
92927850	almost 5 years ago	No worries, thanks.
92928207	almost 5 years ago	Oops, didn't mean to make a changeset this big, sorry :(
92676026	almost 5 years ago	Hello, this changeset "massive cleanup" caused a chunk of the Fletcher boundary to go missing, can you fix it?
92288516	almost 5 years ago	I have corrected the boundary. Please do not leave boundaries broken in this way as it breaks data consumers that use this data. I strongly recommend using JOSM rather than iD for non-trivial edits.
92288516	almost 5 years ago	Hello, this change broke the boundary of Naperville. It is now an unclosed polygon. Are you able to fix this problem?
92261919	almost 5 years ago	Came looking for this, and OpenStreetMap did not disappoint.
88112383	almost 5 years ago	Hey there- the city of Missoula currently has a broken boundary polygon. Might you be willing to take a crack at drawing it in?