OpenStreetMap
ZeLonewolf's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 96122989 | over 4 years ago | Hello, the boundary is now broken: |
| 95883518 | over 4 years ago | Thank you for this fix. I'm surprised JOSM doesn't flag that as a warning. |
| 95710894 | over 4 years ago | It has also broken the boundary of Sydney. |
| 95710894 | over 4 years ago | Hi there - looks like this change messed up the border of Brooklyn. There is a way dangling off of it. |
| 95655098 | over 4 years ago | Can you clarify where I've made an error so that I might correct it? Sometimes in the polygon cleanup I might grab a nearby street node inadvertently, and sometimes the street does separate adjacent landuses. |
| 95259200 | over 4 years ago | Looks like Duarte is also broken, see: osm.org/relation/9319973 |
| 95259200 | over 4 years ago | Hi, this city boundary is quite broken - please take a look at: osm.org/relation/5547859 |
| 87369448 | over 4 years ago | Tagging of state parks is definitely a challenge... see osm.wiki/Proposed_features/Park_boundary |
| 94854817 | over 4 years ago | I'm pretty sure Carto doesn't support this tag. Perhaps open a ticket? https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues |
| 94288505 | over 4 years ago | Hello, you deleted a piece of the boundary - please fix this! |
| 93828947 | almost 5 years ago | There was a missing piece of the boundary. The line was on the map, but it was not in the boundary relation. |
| 93828947 | almost 5 years ago | I had fixed Scharloo earlier, but I was able to see where the boundary was supposed to be in that case. |
| 93828947 | almost 5 years ago | That link is to the OpenStreetMap US server. But many people from other countries are on it as well. It is easier to communicate there than changeset comments. All of the boundaries I am seeing are fixed now, thanks! |
| 93827403 | almost 5 years ago | I just fixed the Punda boundary also, the segment existed but it wasn't in the boundary relation. |
| 93828947 | almost 5 years ago | The eastern boundary is completely missing when you look at: osm.org/relation/7237830 I'm not sure about iD, but in JOSM they are reported as errors. I see these errors because I operate a web site that uses boundary data. When they break, I see that they are broken. If you are able to get on Slack chat (https://slack.openstreetmap.us/) I would be happy to help you more. |
| 93827403 | almost 5 years ago | Looks good! I added the missing "outer" boundary relation roles. The boundary for Punda (osm.org/relation/7237830) is still broken. |
| 93828947 | almost 5 years ago | This boundary also is missing a section: osm.org/relation/7237830 |
| 93827403 | almost 5 years ago | I trust that you will choose the correct location of the boundary! As long as it forms a complete loop. |
| 93827403 | almost 5 years ago | Hi, if you load osm.org/relation/9507096 into a web browser, you should see that a piece of the boundary is missing. |
| 93827403 | almost 5 years ago | Hi, it looks like the boundary relation for Berg Altena (9507096) was left in a broken state? |