aaronsta's Comments
Changeset | When | Comment |
---|---|---|
65061586 | about 6 years ago | Hi magrej,
Just a reminder to make yourself familiar with the OSM Wiki before undertaking any edits. Round-a-bouts should not be tagged with any name=* value (unless the round-a-bout itself is named, for example the Point Lewis Rotary near the Narrows Bridge / Kings Park. As the Perth editing community is small, mistaken edits can take months or years to be identified, if at all for those less obvious ones. As a result it is important to get edits right first time every time. All the best, |
69226201 | about 6 years ago | Hi Steerage250, Cheers for your edit,
Also note that in this edit you added a crossing where there is infact no pedestrian crossing at this location. Please ensure that you know that features actually exist either by (preferably) visiting in person. Please do not solely base decisions on outdated, low quality aerial images. As the Perth editing community is small it can take months or years (if at all) for mistaken edits to be picked up. As a result it is critical to get edits correct first time every time. All the best, |
65423642 | about 6 years ago | Hi Aleksandar Matejevic, Thanks for your edit :)
Perth has a small editing community and it is >critical< that you do your edits right first time every time as a result. It was only by chance that I picked this up. Some mistaken edits, especially those which are not obvious can take months if not years to identify and correct, if ever. Cheers, |
66764392 | about 6 years ago | Hi Olivia,
This is not an isolated issue with telenav updates in Perth with the ability to make turns remove when they are legally and practically still possible. Nonetheless your updates are appreciated. Cheers :) |
69622278 | about 6 years ago | Hi sb9576, Thanks for your edit,
Cheers, All the best, aaronsta |
68862530 | over 6 years ago | Further to this you also removed some important tags which made roads unpasssable, issues with oneway restrictions, and tagged Lord Street as secondary, when it is best practice to follow the Main Roads Western Australia tagging guidelines (even if they are a bit outdated, and may not reflect the usage). Not to be harsh or anything, but just since the Perth mapping community is small it can take months if not years for problems to be picked up especially if they are not obvious, so it is important to get it right first time. Cheers :) |
68862530 | over 6 years ago | Hi shinjiman :) Thanks for your edits! Just a friendly reminder to please be more careful with as you have not tagged the road properly, and some are still not accessible (and not changed), and some have redundant or incorrect tagging. Cheers,
|
66890114 | over 6 years ago | Hi christopherlam, This road is infact not yet open, and should have been split, also same comment as per previous changeset, please ensure you are familiar with OSM mapping practice. Cheers,
Hi christopherlam, Thanks for your edits :) Please be more careful when making edits.
fixme=REMOVE REDUNDANT TAGS WHEN YOU EDIT THIS WAY
The correct procedure would have been to tag ALL the roads with their construction=* value which was motorway_link, then check over ALL the keys, and remove the redundant ones (i.e fixme=* and construction=* in this case) You removed some values, and not others and tagged the road incorrectly. I suggest you review the wiki pages and guides for tagging, as the Perth mapping community is small and problem edits can take months if not years to be corrected. Cheers,
|
66891986 | over 6 years ago | Hi christopherlam, Thanks for your edits :) Please be more careful when making edits.
fixme=REMOVE REDUNDANT TAGS WHEN YOU EDIT THIS WAY
The correct procedure would have been to tag ALL the roads with their construction=* value which was motorway_link, then check over ALL the keys, and remove the redundant ones (i.e fixme=* and construction=* in this case) You removed some values, and not others and tagged the road incorrectly. I suggest you review the wiki pages and guides for tagging, as the Perth mapping community is small and problem edits can take months if not years to be corrected. Cheers,
|
66470536 | over 6 years ago | Hi woodpeck,
I undertook selected JOSM validation edits which could be performed automatically with a high level of confidence including duplicate nodes, blank nodes without any tags, and nodes part of the corner of a building, close to 90° (Select a few of the nodes in the list and have a look) The reason why the changeset area extends to Europe must be something related to an ocean relation and a node modified as part of a way within that relation. Cheers, |
64868476 | over 6 years ago | Hi shinjiman, Thanks for your edits, Please make sure you are familiar with OSM mapping practices before undertaking edits. You did things including.
As the Perth mapping community is small it can take months if not years for things to be picked up, especially if they visually appear okay. |
65642008 | over 6 years ago | Hi Witters00, Thank you for your edits.
You did things such as creating unnamed and incorrectly classified roads.
While your help is much appreciated, given the small community of OSM editors in Perth, some edits can take months if not years to notice. Your edits especially, given that they appear to be normal. Cheers, |
66334922 | over 6 years ago | Restored relation, I accidentally deleted the whole relation instead of just a few members. |
62162621 | almost 7 years ago | Hi shinjiman,
Unfortunatley you have done the following:
Please make sure that you do high-quality edits, as the Perth OpenStreetMap editiing community is small, and it can take months (if not years) for poor quality edits to be noticed and corrected. Functionality / getting it right the first time is more important than doing a quick fix for outdated data. I have reverted this edit to simplify a fix. All the best, and I hope you continue to edit. :) Regards, aaronsta |
57259915 | about 7 years ago | Hi speedwatcher34.
Please do not make edits unit you confirm the data. Some mistaken edits are not picked up for years. This one took two months which is quick. |
51006667 | over 7 years ago | Thank you CherryBombbb for your edit.
|
53989293 | over 7 years ago | Generally it should be an exact match. Urban Areas:
Non-urban areas:
Exceptions are when there has been construction which would affect the road heirarchy, and not yet updated on the MainRoads WA website or where ever else you are sourcing this information from. or some other road condition which does not match reality (i.e a dead-end road shown as a through road by MainRoads and as a tertiary road, should perhaps be downgraded to residential, or a road which does not exist, or exists only as a narrow unpaved track *depending on the specific circumstances. Note in regional W.A. many roads should still be marked as a higher classification as per MainRoads, even if they are 4WD only dirt tracks, as they may be the only significant access route to the area. Here's a document on the road heirarchy detailing how the roads are classified:
|
53989293 | over 7 years ago | Hi Herriotto :)
It is a bit hard to work out imagery dates, as you could have one date for an image in one area, and several kms away it could have been taken on a different day. Living in Perth, what I tend to do is look at a recent thing that has been built or changed and see if it shows up on an the aerial images. I had a quick look and worked out the following dates for the iD OSM website editor:
99% of the time these aerial images are good, only for the newer stuff can it be a bit more tricky. Personally I have found a mix of searching the web for info and maps and visiting places on my daily commute enough to get my info. Like you have been doing, I also use a lot of Landgate data and maps from data.wa.gov.au, for things like road names, in combination with the JOSM program to do edits where you can overlay maps using the WMS (web-map service) links from the data.wa.gov.au website. But, they are removing the old SLIP Enabler services at the end of December, and changing things, so these services might not be available soon. So really any and all information you can get your hands on, you can use to check stuff. In terms of websites these three are very helpful:
Thanks for your edits,
|
53989293 | over 7 years ago | Hi herriotto,
Please make sure to verify your edits, you should not be using outdated third party information to do editing. ESRI imagery is more outdated than MapBox imagery for this location. You should not be basing your edits on either of these sources for this location. Even if you have no familiarity with the area and have never visited it before, you should verify your information, the highway=construction and construction=motorway ways should be enough to alert you that you should verify your edits. Details confirming the current alignment can be found in the link below where the road alignment was changed from the 28th of August this year.
Cheers, |
52413894 | over 7 years ago | Hi stampyfanclub :) Thanks for your edit,
Cheers,
|