If its not actually a school anymore then why go out of your way to preserve it? The map shouldn't be made worse just so local mappers can find obvious errors easier. Having no data is much better than bunk data, someone can also see there's nothing there on the map and go look for it. Local mappers can look and see that this changeset goes over their community and use QA tools like https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=149843868#7/31.445/-95.397 to see if it actually impacted them.

No, strongly disagree. Reverting this was a terrible decision. Also how is that example surely wrong? I don't see what's wrong with it.

There is no consensus to the idea that all large changeset bboxes are bad and should not be allowed. It even says there's no consensus on optimal bbox size, just that ideally changesets are local and not super big. In practice, world spanning changesets are normal and I don't know why people are now objecting to these two.

I would infinitely rather look at one large changeset when reviewing than track down every single local changeset someone makes. Trying to force an interpretation of non-binding guidelines with no consensus to it because of osmcha's limitations doesn't really make sense either.

I dont think its wrong to stop landuse at the curb, it makes the most sense to me to have whats between the roads as a distinct landuse block. I don't have anything against stopping at sidewalks I just think curbs is easier and simpler.

oh my god im so sorry, that was the wrong link. i meant to send this one

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2UJ_a7mxGpM

live armando reaction

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j5a0W0UqIPk

its fine to have a changeset this large for massive tag changes and tbh if youre as stupid as you would need to be to think that queer should include non queer people, none of your opinions matter. also plenty of queer people are straight, which is a degree of basic nuance you're clearly incapable of Armando.

yeah bestie im just gonna be blunt and honest with you, if you keep going down this path and with this attitude, you're just gonna get blocked from editing by the data working group and have all your edits reverted anyway. like there are thousands of people who have done the same as you and all get the same outcome. plus most of the time the people who do this get a ton of community attention and get their property micromapped purely from spite of dealing with them.

deleting things because theyre on private property isn't how this is dealt with. access=private is what people use. this is something thoroughly well laid out, you're not the first person to do this and certainly wont be the last. if you want to read more. if you want to read more about why here's a good wiki link osm.wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property

its perfectly acceptable to have large changeset sizes if its reasonable. doing a brief look over of babis b's changes it seems reasonable to just revert them. thats absolutely a good enough reason to have a world spanning changeset.

Yeah I was thinking it could be tertiary too. Before it was a residential road and the western part of Crittenden Road is also residential (and been that way for years), so I thought it was better to trust it and retag it to residential.

Hi, feel I should step in and clarify this isn't a mechanical edit, it was all manual. This was stated in the other changeset.

apologies for the changeset size, i clicked the button to upload each change individually in josm, but i clearly messed it up somehow

No response and cant find anything about it online, so id say its safe to just remove.

Hey, what is the reason why you added some of these abandoned railways? Some of them dont seem like theres anything left, just going through empty farmland. If its completely gone its better served on openhistoricalmap, which actually got some new rail features recently.

Hey, hope you're having a good day, why did you delete the driveways 1210204974 and 756845436 in this changeset?

Yeah something being on privilate property does not mean it should be deleted. Just put access=private. Here's a wiki page with more info osm.wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property

Oh thank you for finding that! It's a little embarrassing that I managed to miss that but thanks for checking it, I'll try to be more vigilant next time.

Why did you delete this path? it seems to still exist