Hm, "opravy" aby sa bicykle dostali tam kam nemaju, na dodnes nezrealizovanu cyklotrasu? Neviem ako to bolo pre 7 rokmi, ale dnes je tam zakaz vjazdu vsetkych vozidiel, nie len motorovych.

Podla coho tam mozu len lesnicke vozidla?

Ako viete, ze osm.org/node/7519812216 je pamatnik a nie umelecke dielo? Koho to teda znazornuje/pripomina?

Zaujimave, ze kaplnka osm.org/way/224925787 nie je place of worship. To zase z Ortofoto? Asi rovnako ako nazov osm.org/way/224926052 .

Zaujimavo vymysleli tu obchadzku krizovatky D1/D4 .

Bod osm.org/node/2685044293 ma byt bez motorway_junction?

Vidim, ze si nedate povedat. Uz ste to raz zmenili, pisal som Vam, nevysvetlili ste. Zase ste to zmenili. Je teda zrejme, ze len robite hromadne automaticke zmeny bez znalosti objektov na mieste. Ci vandalizmus, ci zmeny naslepo, v kazdom pripade v OSM zakazane.

Jasne, zase vymysleny nazov Lurdska jaskyna bez toho, aby ste tam boli. Nazov "Kaplnka Lurdskej Panny Márie" tam dodnes je, takze naozaj nechapem, o co Vam ide.

Zdravim, natural=grassland je divoka step/pusta/savana. Tie luky popri ceste v Stiavniku budu asi nieco ine, niekde landuse=grass, niekde mozno landuse=meadow.

building:part bolo spravne, je to len cast budovy. Cize ste vytvorili budovu v budove.
amenity=doctors, a vo vnutri dalsie amenity=doctors? To nedava velmi zmysel.
Obe zmeny teda rovnaka chyba.
Je mozne, ze nieco z toho urobil potichu ten editor iD, ale mate ho kontrolovat a najlepsie nepouzivat, ako som Vam uz pisal.

Skor to druhe, kedze uz na Ortofoto 2017-2019 (ako ju mame dnes) je vidiet, ze potok cestu vobec nekrizuje. Neviem teda aku Ortofoto v roku 2020 pouzil (mozno este 2019 pre Vychodne Slovensko nebola pristupna). Ale aspon nepise nic o osobnej navsteve.
Opravil som priebeh Lubotinky a brodov na nej.

Hi, the fords you have added are not seen on Ortofotomozaika SR. How do you know they are there?

osm.org/node/4803612670 . Branch=sk ? To vyzera velmi divne.

Dakujem, toto vyzera dobre.

Thanks, I will read that wiki page.

However, it may do harm to do it like this, as it may violate the principle to not draw lanes as separate OSM ways if they are not physically separated (when there are no separating kerbs).
Also some people claim drawing it your way helps navigation apps, but that does not seem true as I have driven a car through the rounadabout on the west and the GPS cannot really distinguish in which lane you are driving, so it is giving you invalid instructions.
I have already reverted some cases of these turbo-roundabouts and remodelled them using the *:lanes tags and connectivity relations, you can see e.g. at osm.org/#map=19/48.092562/17.121643 .

Zdravim, preco su hranice farnosti vlozene ako 'inner' cleny v tejto relacii? To mi nejako nedava zmysel. Uz su tam spravne ako clenovia 'subarea'.
A akoze zdroj 'survey'? To ste tie hranice presli osobne?

Zdravim, poprosim trochu zmysluplnejsie popisy sad zmien: osm.wiki/Cs:Dobr%C3%A9_koment%C3%A1%C5%99e_sad_zm%C4%9Bn

Zdravim, co su tieto oblasti Sever a Stred? Zda sa, ze to nie su casti Povazskej Bystrice (aspon dnes nie, https://www.minv.sk/?uzemne-a-spravne-usporiadanie-slovenskej-republiky&subor=233491 ). Su to nejake sidliska?

Zdravim, preco je kostol a fara vylucena z hranice farnosti?
Ako zdroj uvadzate https://www.dcza.sk/sk/schematizmus/dekanaty, ale tam vidim len velmi hrubu schematicku mapku, z ktorej tazko odvodit hranice s potrebnou presnostou pre OSM. Alebo ste vychadzali z hranic obci? Ale na niektore tie farnosti v ramci mesta PB bolo treba ist este presnejsie a tam ste ake hranice pouzili.

A aka je licencia tychto udajov? Mate povolenie z tej stranky obkreslit farnosti do OSM?

Also please pay attenton to the invalid changes to bus route relations like osm.org/relation/11063368 . They are not stop_areas, but routes.

Thanks. It seems the lanes are now visible on ESRI imagery and yes, there are at least the parking spaces and a lot of lines separating the cycleways.
So I will try to improve it from the imagery.