Roads around Mramorova? Then why do you touch motorway at Kuty in this same changeset?
Do not mix different changes at distant places into one changeset.

On osm.org/way/350416529 the tag turn:lanes:forward=none;slight_right seems to be wrong. If you only can turn right, there is no need for 'none' in the same lane. Anyway, the lane seems to allow through traffic continuing onto road 65, so only tagging 'slight_right' seems to be wrong.
If we fixed it to through;slight_right (as exists on the overhead sign, not on the road), the whole tag seems to be unneded, if it would just mark all the turns possible on the road (through and right), it would add no new information. There is no other possibility to turn, so why would we need to tag anything. But maybe there is something else you wanted to express with this tag. Please explain.

Hi, why do the different landuses and natural land covers overlap here? If there is wood, there is no grass (there may be under the trees, but it is a different type of landuses, it is intended for wood/forest, not for growing grass. You should have used multipolygons here, to cut out the different plant areas so they do not overlap.

Dakujem za revert, aspon toto je tak ako sme to chceli urobit.

Revertovali ste vsetky boxy po Slovensku, kde ich tento autor nezmyselne vymazal a posunul?

Znacky ste upravili (takze uz operator=Zasilkovna) nenajdeme, ale na spravne miesto ste box nepresunuli, hoci na jeho stranke je vidiet kde je.

A kazdy box v samostatnej sade zmien, aby sa to po Vas tazko hladalo. Vyborne.

Vyborne, necitate historiu objektov (osm.org/changeset/167829367 ) a potom zahladzujete stopy, aby sme tieto chybne boxy s operator=Zasilkovna lahko po Slovensku nenasli.

Zdravim, ked uz ma cast budovy znacku building:part, tak 'building' uz nema mat. Chapem co ste chceli dosiahnut tymi zmenami vysky, ale zial ste budovu dost donicili aj dalsimi zmenami. Skusim to opravit.

Ale vtedy ked ste to robili, tak to tak este v skutocnosti nebolo. A ak si vsimnete, ani teraz to este nie je tak ako hovorite, lebo sice mozno podla dlazby je to ako pisete, ale podla zebry je to ako pisem ja. Proste znacenie cez cestu nesedi na to co je na chodniku (zebra konci na cykloceste a ciarkovany prechod na chodniku pre chodcov). Dobre, pockam par dni ci to premaluju a potom to opravim. Dakujem.

Ano tato "oprava" nie je spravna, bod reprezentuje maximalnu vysku sopky, nie nadmorsku vysku na mieste bodu. Pozrite odkazovanu sadu zmien. A tiez ako ste na nadmorsku vysku 790 prisli? Z Ortofoto urcite nie, takze treba uvadzat skutocne zdroje.

Standardne bez zdroja...

Potom mozno pipeline=substation substation=nieco (distribution alebo ina spravna hodnota), substance=water.

No neviem, ci tie macacie hlavy povazovat za barieru (aj pesiak aj bicykel ju moze prejst), ale ak je to tak myslene tak nech. Potom by bolo vhodne ju zakreslit. Obrazok ale ukazuje, ze cyklopriechod v strednej casti krizovatky (kde je semafor) je vychodne od zebry pre pesich, tak ako som to urobil v OSM. Usek osm.org/way/643951733 je v OSM opacne ako je namalovany v realite (cykloprechod ma byt zapadnejsie).

Bol som to pozriet a trochu to upravili, ale stale ta stredna cast je podla mna spravne. Tie spojky ako osm.org/way/204022536 su opacne ako mame v OSM. Otazka je, ci to treba takto kreslit oddelene ako dve cesty, ked tam nie je bariera.

Nie, ja som to tak videl ako som to zakreslil. Ale boli tam este nejake zatarasy, mozno sa to zmeni.

Preco revert? Nenapisali ste dovod ani sem ani do povodnej sady zmien.

Ako viete, ze vsetky tie potoky idu pod cestou tunelom/priepustom a nie je tam most? Nie vsetky su dobre vidiet na Ortofotomozaike. Zase ste vsade boli, ci to len mechanicky menite, aby bol iD spokojny?

Preco odseknutie cesty osm.org/way/1414408039 ked ma rovnake vlastnosti ako povodna cesta?
A preco osm.org/way/1414408040 ?

Zdravim, co ste tu revertovali a preco?

Zdravim, co to znamena "+firma" ?

Dobry den, Vy ste asi boli na kazdej ulici v Bratislave, ako ste pisali.

Preco vymazavate body ako osm.org/node/372829138 a potom hned vedla vytvorite novy bod osm.org/node/12824978057 ? Preco nestaci presun?

Preco odsekavate useky ciest, hoci su ich vlastnosti rovnake ako povodna cesta? Napr. osm.org/way/1385228888 , osm.org/way/1385228885 , osm.org/way/1385228890 , osm.org/way/1385228886 , osm.org/way/1385228879 , osm.org/way/1385228889 , osm.org/way/1385228887 .

Relacia osm.org/relation/19110763 je v poriadku? Co zakazuje zabocit zo Syslej ulice na Parkovu? Ciaru na ceste nevidim. Aka je tam dopravna znacka?

Vytvorili ste novu vetvu cesty osm.org/way/1385228878 , ale ponechali ste ju v relacii osm.org/relation/2744419 , kam asi nepatri.

osm.org/node/12824978038 naozaj brana? Na Ortofoto su tam mini_bumps. To iste osm.org/node/12824964829 , osm.org/node/51250879 .

Preco je chodnik osm.org/way/1385228872 ako sidewalk, ked nejde popri ceste? Nemal by ako sidewalk byt oznaceny chodnik osm.org/way/799366783 ?

Zase nahodne zmeny unclassified na residential na cestach bez nazvu, ako napr. osm.org/way/10117183

Thanks for the changeset description. But if there is no traffic sign, just the road is not passable by some vehicles, you should not add those 'bicycle', 'vehicle', etc. tags. Those are for legal permissions and traffic signs. Physical restrictions are tagged differently, e.g. by 'width', 'surface', 'visibility', highway=path and similar tags.