Hi, why do you add the wikidata tags on the boundary relation and not on the nodes with the place=* tags representing the cities/villages? I don't think any application will find the wikidata tags on the boundary relations which aren't tagged as towns/villages (only some people know that in Slovakia admin_level=9 represents the extent of a town/village's cadastral boundary).

Hi, why did you take the route_master relation of Bus 7 in Komarno and changed it into Bus 1 in a different city? osm.org/relation/4524103/history . What is the point of that? That's surely not how things are done as it it is a completely different object. Also you even forgot to remove this route from the network of public transport of Komarno.

Other than that, thanks for the updates. Did you update the bus routes in Komarno for the changes of Arriva NZ from 1st Jan 2020?

Zdravim, prosim pouzivajte znacku start_date na urcenie postavenia/otvorenia objektu, nie year_of_construction, ktora nie je dokumentovana a je to duplicita k start_date. Vyskyty opravim. Dakujem.

Hi, please uz start_date tag instead of the undocumented year_of_construction. Thanks.

Nice invalid names again.
Please read osm.wiki/Names .

I wonder if this node is really a full bus station instead of a single bus stop. Anyway, you again put your personal note into the 'name' tag. Fortunately someone already moved it at least to description, which still isn't the best, but at least it is not in name.

The existing bus stop is already part of the bus line 96 relation osm.org/relation/3307795, which you can see rendered e.g. at osm.org/#map=19/48.12743/17.12526&layers=T. So the important information is already in OSM and anything you added was unnecessary and invalid (using 'name' tag wrongly) data.

What purpose would 2 stops (actually platforms) 3 meters apart serve? Yes, if there would be different transport modes (like tram and bus) or different bus operators, then maybe. But you added no such information and clearly duplicated the existing platforms for bus 96. So you did not do what you claim you did. Of course, it may be hard to distinguish these nuances of OSM data using a limited editor like MAPS.ME, which is not particularly suited for this task. It is mainly a map renderer and router.

Hi, why are you adding a bus stop that is already there? Also, you must not put fictional names or your own comments into the "name" tag.

Zdravim, podla coho ste pridali access=permissive na branky do zaplaveneho podchodu, napr. osm.org/node/2193277344 ? Nemali by byt trvalo zatvorene so zakazanym pristupom? Vy ste tam pridali, ze je vyslovene povolene tam ist. Predtym (bez access znacky) tam brana znemoznovala pristup a navigacie ten podchod obchadzat. Zmenilo sa tam nieco?

Hi. Thanks for the corrections of surface values. Oreg does not speak English (he can speak German), but I have discussed your question with him and you are right, he did mean area=yes. You can fix areal=yes, wherever you find it as his addition.
Thanks for checking for invalid tags and improving the mapping quality.

Hi, there shouldn't be any castle on the Tyrkysova street. You didn't provide any source for your addition. Can you show the castle website or any photo?
Also, it surely doesn't have only a Russian name. Please do not make up fictional objects in Openstreetmap.

Zdravim, no hadam sa to kulturne stredisko nenazyva so vsetkymi s velkymi pismenami.

Zdravim, co znamena znacka hiking=path, ktoru ste pridali na par ciest po Slovensku?

Yes, after I fixed all the 50 damaged bus lines... And now you say touching the roundabout wasn't really needed from you.
I'm happy you update the "Mária út" route, but I object to the unnecessary damage you do alongside it. You are using the iD editor which is the worst one to use for relation editing. Thus it may be you are not seeing the other relations you are unknowingly touching. The route in Bratislava still had some gaps after your edits so I fixed those yesterday.

Yes (a fictional 'proposed' route), I have found that so far. But how is it related to the country border (below the bridge) that you have also split and thus damaged many administrative boundary relations using it?

Zdravim, nie kazda na hodna travnata plocha v meste je parkom.

Again, in this changeset you have damaged some bus routes in Bratislava. Immediatelly stop doing this damage and explain what you are doing (as changeset descriptions are missing). Also, stop splitting junction=roundabout into segments. That is not needed and it is no problem if whole roundabout is part of a route that is going through it.

Zdravim, ze Vas to este bavi, cele roky len udajne spresnovanie ciest. Mozete s tym uz konecne prestat? Vase "spresnenie" takmer nikdy nie je prinosom (len ked niekto pred Vami cestu pokazil este viac), dodnes ste nevysvetlili povod Vasich "stoviek GPX zaznamov" takze Vase zmeny mozu byt povazovane za nelegalne a vzdy ked vidim zle umiestnenu hlavnu cestu, tak za tym stojite Vy. Rovnako tu nezmyselne posuny dialnice. Prestante uz konecne nicit slovenske cesty.

You can add a 'source' tag on the changeset itself. In JOSM editor it is an explicit input field when uploading the changeset. I don't know where it is in the iD editor. You can also put it in the changeset description. Thanks for adding the street names. I'm aware many towns and villages in south of Slovakia have both SK/HU names on the street signs. I have also added some in the past :)

Hi, what is the point of this change? Why splitting a bridge and making a common node with the country border? That is never done. Also you do not provide any useful description of the changesets (all are just m02 or m05), see osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments .