Thanks, but there are some problems with these changes:
1. Do not move buildings according to Ortofoto images, when they are done according to a more precise source (kapor2 or ZBGIS, Slovak cadastre map). Your changes to buildings like osm.org/way/61399303 at Zahradnicka have damaged correct buildings to incorrect positions.

2. You cannot have 2 level building like osm.org/way/61399303 and inside it a 7 level building like osm.org/way/1318227763 . This is incorrect 3D mapping and should be done differently (7 level 'building' outline and then inside the 2- and 7-level parts), see osm.wiki/Simple_3D_Buildings .

3. address like osm.org/node/12200316201 is incomplete. You could have added a 'fixme' tag so that others notice and finish it.

4. You should not have deleted osm.org/node/6502562114 but just change its tags to the new shop in its place, not create a new node osm.org/node/12200314988 . History of shops at the same place is useful for other mappers.

5. Agains, building length of osm.org/way/78068912 was correct according to cadastre map and imagery. You did not need to change it.

6. For removed buildings, we tend to change their tag from building=* to removed:building=*, not remove them completely from OSM. They may still be visible on older imagery and mappers may be confused. See osm.wiki/Lifecycle_prefix .

Hi, thanks for updating the railway tracks. However the movement of junction points at Kazanska/Dvojkrizna streets (e.g. osm.org/node/25504814 and osm.org/node/18003675 are all wrong. The ways representing roads can be split into 2 separate ways when there is already a physical barrier between them, or it is not physically possible to change from one lane (road) to another. If there is just a white solid line, they should not be separated. See osm.wiki/Lanes#Motorway_with_lanes_and_destinations . You should just have added ''change" tags, without touching the geometry.

Hi, thanks for updating the trolley wires in Bratislava.
However, you have done some mistakes here.

If there is already the tag trolley_wire=yes on both-ways road, adding trolley_wire:backward=yes or :forward does not add anything, as both ways are already tagged. On some roads you ment the wires are only in one direction, in that case you should have removed the bidirectional trolley_wire=yes tag after adding :backward or :forward variant.

Why is there no trolley wire at osm.org/way/203390144 ? How would the trolleybus reverse to the next stop (on the opposite side of the road) ? The trolley wire exists there.

Naozaj je osm.org/node/12925910365/ vnutri budovy? Podla fotiek na stranke Packety nie je. Preco to teda davate takto nepresne?

To iste, nezmyselny vymaz existujuceho bodu a vytvorenie noveho so stratou dobrych udajov.

Preco ste vymazali existujuci bod a nahradili novym, pricom ste stratili dobre udaje a pridali vase sporne? Takto sa to nerobi.

Dobry den. Naozaj je aj na Slovensku operatorom Zasilkovna? Podla webstranky je to "Packeta Slovakia s.r.o."

Aky je zdroj tychto udajov? Co je to "POI Imported", odkial ma udaje a aku licenciu?

Naozaj ma zmysel znacka postal_code ked tam nedorucuje Slovenska posta?

Super, dakujem.

Zdravim, podla coho je osm.org/way/897470220 vojenskym uzemim? Je to tam nejako vyznacene?

Ak planujete mapovat viac a nieco by ste nevedeli, tak pozrite tu wiki (editor iD casto zavadza s navrhmi znaciek), alebo mi napiste, pripadne slovenske OSM forum je na https://groups.google.com/g/osm_sk . Napriklad to miesto s ulmi v lese som Vam opravil.

Veru, Google sa nesmie. Moze sa fotky Mapillary.com a samozrejme vlastne, ale to spada pod source=survey.
Ak mate moznost byt pri zavorach a vidite aka je tam presne dopravna znacka zakazujuca vjazd vozidiel tak to je dobre pridat do OSM. Ak tam znacka nie je ziadna, tak asi len pre vozidla vlastnika ci s povolenim (vehicle=private). Chodci casto prejst mozu, ak tam nie je vyslovne zakaz vstupu aj pre chodcov, ci tabula "sukromny pozemok".

Zda sa mi, ze 1 a 2 su rovnake linky. Ale chapem, co myslite. Len ma to strasne nebavi sekat priechody este na take male kusky :)

Aha, dakujem.

Ano, to verim, zial konkretne iD editor, ktory pouzivate, casto zavadza a jeho nahrady nie su vhodne. Treba ich pouzit len ak naozaj rozumiete co znamenaju.

Dakujem za upozornenie. V dnesnej dobe to tak aj robim, ale samozrejme mi moze nejaka cesta ujst.

Super, dakujem.

Zdravim, co prosim vyjadruje znacka narrow=2 ?

Zdravim, ake "streetlevel imagery" ste tu pouzili?

Hi. Thanks for the additions.
But please try to use established tags as described on osm.wiki .
E.g. the object at osm.org/node/12826418893 is no park, nor a meadow, nor is it called "Beehive meadow" (especially in Slovakia, where local language is not English). So do not put random descriptions into the 'name' tag. Only use proper object names there. The contents of 'description' is fine.
What you wanted is osm.wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dapiary and osm.wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dbeehive . Thanks.

Tiez ak to nie je prevadzka, kam ma chodit verejnost (ako na beznu policajnu stanicu (napr. obvodne oddelenie)), tak tam nepatri ani amenity=police.