I see your point, but I think in this case making all the side roads into tracks kind of eliminates the network element of things, it's harder to see which might be the main ways of travel. In my opinion those ways above and a few others are larger than the rest of the tracks. It also results in a lot of inconsistency, like here, where roads change classification and there are tiny chunks: osm.org/#map=15/-10.1590/33.4339

Let me know what you think. Thanks.

That disagrees with the Chile guidelines which says it need to be between major cities, neither of these are those, and refs are not mentioned there at all. That particular ref also continues farther but the entire route isn't tagged the same way. If I can also make a suggestion again to comment on changesets rather than reverting them, we can talk more about the issues and try to figure them out.

Hi, it looks like you are mapping the roads accurately but please don't add names unless you are there. I doubt these roads in Tanzania are named for you. People rely on this map to be accurate.

Please don't add fake things to the map. They will be removed.

Hola, por favor no nombra calles con latitud y longitud, no están los nombres correctos. Si necesita ayuda, por favor envíame un mensaje.

Hello, please don't name roads for a Latitude and Longitude, that is not the road's name. Let me know if you have any questions.

Buenas dias, por favor no nombra calles con latitud y longitud, no están los nombres correctos. Si necesita ayuda, por favor envíame un mensaje.

Hello, please don't name roads for a Latitude and Longitude, that is not the road's name. Let me know if you have any questions.

Buenas dias, por favor no nombra calles con latitud y longitud, no están los nombres correctos. Si necesita ayuda, por favor envíame un mensaje.

Hello, please don't name roads for a Latitude and Longitude, that is not the road's name. Let me know if you have any questions.

Hi again, can you explain the changes to this segment? Why secondary from trunk? osm.org/way/639780017

Hi, thanks for mapping. It looks like you dragged all these roads out of alignment, please watch out when moving things around. We will fix it. Let me know if you have any other questions.

Hi, i think you moved these roads by mistake. Please be careful.

Hi, thanks for mapping. It looks like you moved these residential roads so now they overlap with buildings and are offset. Let me know if you have any questions, I can fix it for you.

Hi, thanks for mapping. It looks like you moved these residential roads so now they overlap with buildings and are offset. Let me know if you have any questions, I can fix it for you.

Hi, thanks for mapping. It looks like you moved these residential roads so now they overlap with buildings and are offset. Let me know if you have any questions, I can fix it for you.

Hi, similar questions here, I think the unpaved tags are good, thanks! But some of the classification changes are taking out what seems like the main part of the network in this area, such as osm.org/way/652003461#map=16/-10.1531/33.5474 and osm.org/way/620362206#map=16/-10.1564/33.5672

Is there a local highway tracing guide you're using or other source?

Hi, thanks for your edits. It looks like you are changing some things to track, which classification guide are you using? Is it part of validating for HOT tasks? For example, I think these two should probably be unclassified as they are the biggest road around and pretty long, not just for farm use. osm.org/way/588748741#map=17/-10.13859/33.43089 and osm.org/way/652016366#map=15/-10.1301/33.4486 -- plus then it suddenly changes, so it's inconsistent. Thanks!

Hi, in this changeset you added some ref tags and changed the classification, can you tell me more about why?

Hi there, it looks like you deleted some one way tags, removed or added some ref tags, and changed some highway classifications. Can you explain your sources for these edits?

Hi jptolosa87, on this changeset you changed a secondary to a primary but this road doesn't seem like it joins major urban centers like the guidelines say are for primary. Also it might be helpful to comment on previous changesets to ask why a change was made instead of just changing the data. Thanks, let me know what you think. osm.wiki/ES:Chile:Map_Features

Hi again, let me know if I can help with adding the street names or if you have any other questions. And what was the source for the data, did you do a ground survey?

Hi, thanks for your contributions! it looks like you added a lot of "copy shops", cinemas, hostels and other things in the middle of streets. Is that really what they are supposed to be? If there are addresses or buildings or street names, or something else let me know, I can help correct the tags to what they should be.