apm-wa's Comments
Changeset | When | Comment |
---|---|---|
74890009 | over 5 years ago | This tag should only be used for areas dedicated to and actually used for residential purposes. It should not be used for areas with buildings of unknown use
|
74890009 | over 5 years ago | There is no need to mark as residential areas municipalities that have already been demarcated. Please see osm.wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dresidential#When_not_to_use |
67706544 | over 5 years ago | See, for example, this: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=pXMjhdasuKz6rpdvs4R8LA&focus=photo&lat=40.03026539999773&lng=53.5620932&z=17 |
67706544 | over 5 years ago | Please do not modify the route of the M37 based on obsolete imagery. Please use the updated ground-level imagery available via Mapillary. I am reverting your edits and restoring the correct track of this road. |
74590516 | over 5 years ago | I am therefore deleting this extraneous "residential area" since the city is already clearly tagged. |
74590516 | over 5 years ago | It reads: This tag should only be used for areas dedicated to and actually used for residential purposes. It should not be used for areas with buildings of unknown use
|
74590516 | over 5 years ago | It is not necessary to mark cities separately as residential areas. Please read osm.wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dresidential#When_not_to_use |
71224337 | almost 6 years ago | Andy, I have used this (and seen others using it) when buildings were not rendered properly over grounds in the standard layer. Perhaps the various upgrades of the rendering software have rendered this approach obsolete. In any case, the intent is to have buildings appear above the ground, which in my experience has been problematic in the past. Best regards, apm-wa |
71224337 | almost 6 years ago | This is the proper method. Please read this: osm.wiki/Key:layer |
71224337 | almost 6 years ago | In other words, the buildings are rendered ABOVE the ground, not below the ground :-) |
71224337 | almost 6 years ago | This is not strange. Because buildings are by default set to layer=0, if you set grounds at layer=-1, the buildings and grounds are rendered correctly in the standard layer. |
60933145 | about 6 years ago | Pagta zawod или Pagta kabul ediş harmanhansy? |
38012883 | about 6 years ago | Retagging toy mekany as amenity=events_venue per osm.wiki/Turkmenistan#Catering |
62990923 | about 6 years ago | Please do not CAPITALIZE the names of POIs. You only need to capitalize the first letter of a name. |
70251477 | about 6 years ago | Many thanks for your contributions to OSM in Turkmenistan! Please do not enter names of highways (streets, roads, etc.) in ALL CAPITAL LETTERS. I have changed this to Könekesir ýoly. |
69606068 | about 6 years ago | Не надо дублировать уже существующие заправки. Удаляю. |
69606026 | about 6 years ago | Не надо дублировать уже существующие заправки. Удаляю! |
69798737 | about 6 years ago | Nargiza, you messed up Medeniyet and Saja Batyrow streets while editing. I have corrected them but please let me show you how to correct an error like this in the future. We all make mistakes, but we all have to correct them after making them. |
46129074 | over 6 years ago | Ашхабад находится в Туркменистане, не в Узбекистане...и здесь есть некоторые шиитские мечети. |
59275026 | over 6 years ago | A grave is not a place of worship. |