Hi,

In the future, please use more descriptive changeset comments: “.” does not help other mappers understand what you are doing. In this case, 'Add/realign roads, add parking spaces' would've been sufficient. You can read more about what makes a good changeset comment here:
osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Happy Mapping!

What is the source of this road name? osm.org/way/10347072

Hi,
Thanks for your response. In my opinion, I think that Millerton should be secondary. While this road does connect to the casino and surrounding neighborhoods, I would consider minor population centers to be towns like Oakhurst that have more amenities such as schools, libraries, supermarkets, etc

As others have mentioned, highways of the same classification "should collectively form a coherent network of interconnected roads, without dangling spurs or 'islands' of disconnected roads" (see osm.wiki/United_States/Highway_classification). Please keep this in mind when making any future highway classification changes.

Please make sure to review suggestions from the validator before "fixing" them. This changeset added several crossings, fords, and bridges that do not exist, for example:
* osm.org/node/739005403
* osm.org/node/11106095206
* osm.org/node/11106095205
* osm.org/node/11106095209
* osm.org/node/11106095210
* osm.org/way/1196927281

Hi,
Thanks for adding this new road! Please note however that we don't abbreviate road names in OpenStreetMap (see osm.wiki/Abbreviations). I unabbreviated the street 'Pine Ct' added in this changeset to 'Pine Court'.

Hi and welcome to OpenStreetMap! Please note we only use names that are signed on the ground:
osm.wiki/Names#Good_practice
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137902040

Hi,

Thanks for adding these gas stations. In the future, however, please do use more meaningful changeset comments: "Changed some things." does not help other mappers understand what you're doing. In this case, "Added gas stations" would've been sufficient.

Hi,
This changeset reverts a revert I made to changesets that added fictional road names and/or randomly changed highway classifications. Why was this revert reverted?

See osm.org/changeset/137623128

Hi,

It appears that this is an import of building footprints. Please note that if you did not individually review each building added in these changesets, this counts as an import and must be discussed and documented prior to uploading, see osm.wiki/Import/Guidelines

It also looks like each node part of the building ways are also tagged with 'building=yes'. These nodes shouldn't have any tags to comply with osm.wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element

I ask that you revert this changeset and follow the import guidelines/fix errors I pointed out before reimporting. If you're not sure how to revert changes, read osm.wiki/Change_rollback

Hi and welcome to OpenStreetMap! In the future please use more meaningful changeset comments - “edit” does not help other mappers understand what you are doing. In this scenario, "Realigned fairway" would've been a sufficient changeset comment.

These two crosswalks seem to still exist in aerial imagery from 2022

Hi,
Why did you remove crosswalks such as (osm.org/node/9764621855) and (osm.org/node/9764491130)?

Hi,
I noticed this changeset removes valid turn lane information.

For example, (osm.org/way/971874582), (osm.org/way/971874584), and (osm.org/way/971874583), all of which had correct lane/turn lane information, were merged with adjacent ways.

Hi, what is the source for this road name:
osm.org/way/502264080

I think that the revert mentioned (osm.org/changeset/137076656) was a coincidence and isn't related to this issue, it looks like this has been resolved in osm.org/changeset/137252558

If this trail has been permenantely decommissioned, you can retag this path from `highway=path` to `abandoned:highway=path`. This should keep it from getting rendered on the map. Here's a list of other tagging suggestions:
osm.wiki/United_States/Trail_Access_Project#Suggested_Tagging

Hi and welcome to OpenStreetMap! Please don't remove paths just because they're on private property (see osm.wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property). The paths modified in this changeset were already correctly tagged with `access=private`

Why did you create a daycare in the middle of a forest?