OpenStreetMap
archpdx's Comments
| Changeset | कहिले | टिप्पणी |
|---|---|---|
| 166948877 | लगभग 2 महिना अघि | Reverted |
| 166946208 | लगभग 2 महिना अघि | Reverted |
| 166948877 | लगभग 2 महिना अघि | Although it is true that many tourists visit Laguna Beach, given its population is only ~20K it wasn't considered a population center of inter-regional importance (although it looks like it was listed as a potential borderline case). osm.wiki/California/2022_Highway_Classification_Guidelines The US community has also been trying to form a more coherent network of motorways and trunk roads in recent years, and avoiding spurs and islands of these classifications as mentioned here:
Because of this, I think it's best to leave Laguna Canyon as primary before further discussion with the community. |
| 166946208 | लगभग 2 महिना अघि | Given that this stretch mainly consists of RIRO junctions, this would be considered a borderline case as outlined in this wiki article: osm.wiki/United_States/2021_Highway_Classification_Guidance#Exceptions_and_Borderline_Cases Because of this, this stretch of Central shouldn't be changed from its current classification without consultation with the local community. I ask that you please revert these changes until consensus is reached with the community. |
| 165519924 | 3 महिना अघि | I noticed that you accidentally glued a powerline to a sidewalk in this changeset. I understand that it can be easy to unintentionally glue things to each other in iD, this issue can be prevented in the future by opening the Map Data panel in the editor (keyboard shortcut 'U') and unchecking 'Power Features' under 'Map Features'. |
| 163548390 | 5 महिना अघि | Hi and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
|
| 163205685 | 5 महिना अघि | Reverted |
| 163168146 | 5 महिना अघि | Reverted |
| 163168000 | 5 महिना अघि | Reverted |
| 163060046 | 5 महिना अघि | Reverted |
| 162982342 | 5 महिना अघि | Reverted |
| 162982280 | 5 महिना अघि | Reverted |
| 163205491 | 5 महिना अघि | Is there a reason why service=* tags were removed in this changeset? They seem to have been correct. |
| 163204824 | 5 महिना अघि | Is there a reason why surface, maxspeed, and access tags were removed from these service roads? They seem to have been correct? |
| 163170357 | 5 महिना अघि | Please be more careful in the future, it appears that this changeset broke this no right turn restriction relation: osm.org/relation/16204805 |
| 163168000 | 5 महिना अघि | It appears that you accidentally glued a power line to a road. I recommend unchecking 'Power Features' under 'Map Features' in the Map Data panel to prevent this from happening in the future. |
| 163060046 | 5 महिना अघि | This changeset seems to change the neighborhood boundary for North Image into a road. I understand that it might be confusing for everything, including administrative boundaries, to all be in the same layer. This issue can be prevented in the future by opening the Map Data panel in the editor (keyboard shortcut 'U') and unchecking 'Boundaries' under 'Map Features'. |
| 163205685 | 5 महिना अघि | It looks like this changeset turned the neighborhood boundary for North Image / Burnt Bridge Creek into a road and broke the boundary relations for the aforementioned neighborhoods |
| 162559153 | 5 महिना अघि | Hi,
In general, paths like this should only be mapped separately if there's a physical barrier, whether it be a curb, island, etc. Since the pedestrian walkway on Back Bay is only separated by paint, the consensus is to instead use tags on the road itself. |
| 160592679 | 7 महिना अघि | Thanks for the clarification! I'm of the opinion that stretches roughly longer than a Portland block (200 ft) shouldn't be left as a dual carriageway, however you do make a good point about the increased difficulty of maintaining relations and lane tagging as more medians get installed. I know that this can be pretty subjective, so I might start a thread on Slack to give others a chance to chime in. |