Yeah, that looks right. Thanks for pointing out that wiki article, didn't realize `highway=service` is still preferred in these cases.

As I mentioned earlier, please don't use Esri Clarity as its very outdated. This changeset adds sand traps that were removed at least five years ago.

As others have pointed out to you, please avoid deleting and redrawing features and instead realign existing features.

Even though HPU is here, the whole shopping center shouldn't be tagged as a school. Please create a separate point for HPU instead.

FYI, Esri Clarity is almost a decade old (from 2014). I would only use it as a secondary reference in addition to a more up to date source such as Bing.

Based on this changeset from another mapper, it appears that this trail and parking lot no longer exists: osm.org/changeset/138284226

Aerial imagery also suggests this.

Hi and welcome to OpenStreetMap! Thanks for adding this business. Please note that most national brands like Claire's have their own feature type which automatically applies the correct tags (`shop=fashion_accessories` in this case instead of `merchandise=Jewelry`)

Hi,
Just a heads up that `highway=service` is required as its a top level tag. the `service=*` tag describes what type of service road it is. Please refer to osm.wiki/Key:service

FYI I've gotten permission for us to use Crook County's 2023 imagery and in the middle of adding it to the backgrounds list (https://github.com/osmlab/editor-layer-index/pull/2167). It might take a while for it to show up, so for the meantime you can use this url as a custom layer:
https://geo.co.crook.or.us/server/rest/services/Hosted/Crook_2023_3in9in/MapServer/tile/{zoom}/{y}/{x}

Thanks for the heads up! I've retagged it in osm.org/changeset/144775536

Hi,
Please don't add unsigned route numbers to ref=*, instead unsigned_ref=* should be used:
osm.wiki/Key:unsigned_ref

Hi,
Please don't add unsigned route numbers to ref=*, instead unsigned_ref=* should be used:
osm.wiki/Key:unsigned_ref

Hi,
What is the source for these changes? Unless this has changed relatively recently, this stretch of Barbur/Natio is still signed as OR 99W.

I originally split some of these islands into dual carriageways as other traffic islands on Foster that were there before the road diet (ie Foster/Cora) were already mapped as dual carriageways. Also, at least to me, it didn't really make sense to have the crossing node in the middle of the refuge island.

As Minh mentioned, mapping refuge islands as dual carriageways is common practice: for example Grand River Ave in Detroit (osm.org/#map=19/42.40571/-83.23111) and Chaparral Rd in Scottsdale (osm.org/#map=19/33.50966/-111.91284).

If you feel strongly about this, I encourage you to discuss this with other mappers on either the forum or Slack to form a consensus on whether these should or shouldn't be mapped as dual carriageways. I want to make sure these are mapped consistently.

Hi,
Thanks for adding these new roads! I know this is an old changeset, but just wanted to let you know that road names shouldn't be abbreviated in OSM (see osm.wiki/abbreviation) It looks like another mapper has since unabbreviated these road names.

Happy Mapping!

Hi and welcome to OpenStreetMap! Thanks for mapping features at The Living Desert. Please note that animal enclosures have their own feature type and should not be tagged as parks or commercial areas. Also, buildings in OSM should only cover its footprint (ie osm.org/way/47512765).

Hi and welcome to OpenStreetMap! Thanks for fixing this road name. However, please note that we don't abbreviate road names in OSM (see osm.wiki/abbreviation). In this case, this road name should be unabbreviated to 'Meadow Lark Drive'. Happy Mapping!

It appears that you've accidently changed Dumpling Depot to a viewpoint. I've gone ahead and reverted this change in osm.org/changeset/142676206

Hi and welcome to OpenStreetMap! Thanks for mapping these benches and picnic tables. However, please note that walking route relations should only include the paths themselves and not adjacent features such as the benches/picnic tables you added. Would you be able to remove these from the route relations you modified in this changeset? Thanks and happy mapping!

Hi,
Thanks for adding these buildings! However, please note that they should ideally outline the ground footprint rather than the roof outline since the imagery you're using might not be truly orthogonal.

In the future, I'd highly recommend using building footprints from RLIS:
https://rlisdiscovery.oregonmetro.gov/datasets/building-footprint-database/about

No worries, I've gone ahead and changed the name back in osm.org/changeset/142244992