Hi, you seem to have downgraded quite a few residential roads to service, including dual carriagewayways like NW 23rd Ave, which quite clearly isn't a service road. What was the reason/background for this?

Hi, and welcome to OSM. Please be careful when panning the map, as sometimes nodes can be accidentally displaced and snapped to other roads, as was the case here with Griffin Road. I've fixed the error. Thanks & happy mapping!

Hi, please make sure to add layer=-1 when to waterway tunnels or culverts. Also, meaningful changeset comments help other mappers get an idea about what changed, so please help us by adding some meaningful description about what was done in each of your changesets in the future. Thanks in advance.

Cordial saludo, la nomenclatura tiene prevalencia sobre los nombres alternos, a menos que la señalización en el terreno indique lo contrario (véase osm.wiki/ES:Buenas_pr%C3%A1cticas#Cartografiar_lo_que_hay_sobre_el_terreno). Por favor use el valor de la nomenclautura en la etiqueta name y la etiqueta alt_name para los nombres alternos (Amador, Cundinamarca, etc.) No existe consenso absoluto sobre el uso de nombres múltiples, así que por favor no haga cambios con esa base ya que puede ser considerado editar para el renderizador (osm.wiki/ES:Buenas_pr%C3%A1cticas#No_mapear_para_el_renderizado)

Hi, you seem to have snapped together a river, riverbank, admin boundary and railway in this changeset around Calle 92. Could you have a look and fix? Since you're using iD, you might find it useful to turn off the admin boundaries layer by selecting Map Data (shortcut f) > Map Features and unchecking Boundaries or Railway features (or any others you might find useful in limiting the scope of your edit. Lastly, please use more descriptive changeset comments; "n" is not sufficiently descriptive of what changes you've performed (see osm.wiki/Good_practice#Good_changeset_comments). Should you have any questions, please don't hesitate to get in touch. Happy mapping!

Thanks for the response and for trying to fix the issues. In the end the issues were too many to fix individually so I had to revert his/her changesets completely. In the process, I also had to resolve conflicts with your edits, so if you could keep an eye in the area for potential geometry errors arising out of the revert & conflict resolution I'd appreciate it --or indeed if the user decides to make another wave of "bad" changesets. Unfortunately the aerials for the area are quite outdated and the last time I drove by that segment of highway it was under construction, so not sure which of the incorrectly merged value for the lanes tag is most up-to-date.
Cheers,
carciofo

Hi, thanks for your contribution. There are, however, quite a few duplicate overlapping roads in this changesets. Kindly remove the duplicates as they're coming up in data quality tools. Thanks in advance.

Hi, regarding way 489170464, could you check the maxheight attribute you added to it? 15" seems like an impossibly low clearance. Thanks

Hi Jonathan, this looks like an import judging by the tags in the relations. Could you please let us know what source you used for this along with a link to the license or any discussion to that effect? Thanks in advance.

Bienvenido a OSM. Algunos de sus cambios, en especial equellos que modifican la prioridad de las vías al igual que sus nombres debieron ser revertidos. Lo invitamos a que visite la wiki para conocer más acerca del significado de cada etiqueta y su uso y convenciones en OSM. La guía para mapear en Colombia contiene un buen resumen de las prioridades de carreteras en OSM aplicadas al caso específico de Colombia al igual que el etiquetado de calles que tienen varios nombres: osm.wiki/ES:Gu%C3%ADa_para_mapear_en_Colombia. Si tiene alguna duda no dude en ponerse en contacto. Cordial saludo.

Hello!
Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and found some errors or elements
that could be mapped in a better way. Feel free to message me
to know more about it or visit http://learnosm.org/ to get started.
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55391150

Hi, could you provide a source for the road priority upgrades you performed in this changeset? E.g. from secondary to primary in Av. del Ferrocarril WAY: 30658150

Hello!
Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and found some errors or elements
that could be mapped in a better way. Feel free to message me
to know more about it or visit http://learnosm.org/ to get started.
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55391336

Hello!
Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and found some errors or elements
that could be mapped in a better way. Feel free to message me
to know more about it or visit http://learnosm.org/ to get started.
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55392103

Hello!
Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and found some errors or elements
that could be mapped in a better way. Feel free to message me
to know more about it or visit http://learnosm.org/ to get started.
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55406571

Hello!
Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and found some errors or elements
that could be mapped in a better way. Feel free to message me
to know more about it or visit http://learnosm.org/ to get started.
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55407779

Hello!
Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and found some errors or elements
that could be mapped in a better way. Feel free to message me
to know more about it or visit http://learnosm.org/ to get started.
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55408318

Hi, just wondering if you could have a look at this? It's been there since Oct of last year... Would appreciate it if you could have a look and remove the duplicate. Thanks in advance.

Hi, there is no divider on Wilton Drive, so it shouldn't be a dual carriageway. Also, when splitting carriageways, please take care to map traffic signals on the new ways. Kindly revert the dual carriageway split. Thanks

Ah, thanks, I seem to have missed the second page of ways in the web UI for the changeset. Actually those ways were created in osm.org/changeset/43041726. The way you've linked appears in this changeset probably only as a result of me having split a way which was originally created in that changeset.