Fixed in osm.org/changeset/134715006

Hi, just curious as to the source for applying the ref=40 to the segment between Buga and La Paila in this changeset? This segment actually is defined as National Hwy 25. Hwy 40 is discontinuous here.

Hola, en este changeset fue borrada la relación del Parque Nacional Natural Isla Salamanca. Si fue un error por favor restaura los datos borrados (Relation 6210917). Gracias

Hi, just wondering if there was any reason to add the addr:city to streets in Plantation and remove the state from the county in the TIGER tags? The former gets reported as an error in OSM Inspector. Would like to understand the reason before reverting. Thanks!

Hi and welcome to OSM. Might I ask why you deleted all the taxiway reference values and their source tags in this changeset? Thanks.

Hi, could you kindly provide a source for the changes to the administrative boundaries here? Would appreciate you adding meaningful comments to your changesets. Many thanks in advance.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114116304

Thanks for the quick response. Looks like I selected the wrong changeset when adding my comment. Sorry for the confusion.

Hi, and thanks for improving the map. I've noticed you editing the ref tag for national highways in Colombia and wanted to ask for the source for these changes. Specifically, in the segment of RN-50 east of Honda, you are using ref=45;50. Are there observations on the ground that support such a tag? To my knowledge and the information published by the National Transportation Ministry of Colombia this segment belongs exclusively to RN-50. Thanks in advance for clearing this up.

Hi, and thanks for improving the map. I've noticed you editing the ref tag for national highways in Colombia and wanted to ask for the source for these changes. Specifically, in the segment of RN-50 east of Honda, you are using ref=45;50. Are there observations on the ground that support such a tag? To my knowledge and the information published by the National Transportation Ministry of Colombia this segment belongs exclusively to RN-50. Thanks in advance for clearing this up.

*marking

Because the area it covers is not a building. Making the perimeter of the plot as a building so that it renders would be mapping for the renderer. An icon is fine in this case afaic: the underlying data is correct.

blast pads are quite specifically *not* part of the runway. See osm.wiki/Talk:Tag:aeroway%3Drunway#runway.3Dblast_pad

Kindly revert your downgrading of secondary route 62 AN 17-1. This is clearly documented : osm.wiki/ES:Wikiproyecto_Colombia/Red_Secundaria/Antioquia. Please provide contact information to file an issue with your team regarding your activities.

Kindly revert your edit, as the information was correct before. You're welcome to look at the Spanish Wikipedia article for the national road system in Colombia. I would have thought that an Apple project would have at the very least started their research there. Unfortunately the community is not large enough to monitor and revert changes from large teams such as yours, so we appreciate you reverting the edit. Thank you in advance.

But this is part of a National Highway though, and connects San Vicente del Caguan with Neiva. The fact that it's unpaved has little influence, as a large portion of rural roads in Colombia are unpaved. Connectivity plays a more defining role on road priority, so this is definitely not unclassified. Tertiary was the correct classification. Kindly revert.

Please see osm.wiki/Good_practice#Align_aerial_imagery_before_tracing

Well, that's why the proviso that they are defined by the Nat'l Transport Minsitry is there. Had you looked that the way trunk roads are defined, you would have seen that they indeed circumvent cities whenever possible. Also, as you're probably aware documentation is scarce and not necessarily up-to-date, as there are few who take on the task. As one of the people who actually write on the wiki, not everything is documented and the actual map should be representative of mapping practices --I think you'll find many examples of trunk circumventing cities (Ipiales, just to the south and Popayan just to the north on Nat'l Hwy 25, just as a couple examples).

The definition clearly states that it must "start at international border crossings and connect major state capitals and/or ports". The road you have marked as trunk does not fulful this criteria because it does not start at an international border crossing. It also states that trunk are defined by the Nat'l Transport Ministry, which is why I was asking for the source you used. If there is no source, then it also does not fulfuil that part of the definition. The problem here is that routing from the south on Nat'l Hwy 25 will be affected, as it would likely try to use the higher priority road (trunk on 74 and 21) over the more direct and shorter 23.

Hi, what your team's guidelines with respect to alignment to aerial imagery which is offset as is the case here? Are you using some geodata source to offset the imagery correctly or just aligning to the imagery without offsetting?

Hi, what was the reason for changing the trunk highway from the peripheral road to the road going through the city? Trunk roads are designed precisely to circumvent big cities...