chillly's Comments
Changeset | When | Comment |
---|---|---|
36690731 | over 9 years ago | This looks like a mechanical edit to me. Have you visited these sites? Why have you made these changes to such a wide area? |
36578320 | over 9 years ago | This seems to be an undiscussed mechanical edit. Mechanical edits must be discussed and agreed in advance. This has not been discussed, so it must be reverted. Please revert this edit as soon as possible. |
36502116 | over 9 years ago | Undiscussed mechanical edits must be reverted. |
36501921 | over 9 years ago | Undiscussed mechanical edits should be reverted. |
36077719 | over 9 years ago | How did you come to the conclusion that the 'path' joins Park Lane by ploughing through a wood? Please do not armchair falsehoods onto the map like this. I am inclined to revert this |
35956062 | over 9 years ago | Welcome to OSM. The website URL is not what you have changed it to. If the website is wrong i suggest you change it the right URL, if the site has been closed them remove the website tag. If there is a short-term loss of service you might like to leave the tag unchanged, possibly adding a a note tag to explain. We try not to bodge fixes with wrong data - it is horribly confusing for people and computers. |
35947797 | over 9 years ago | Welcome to OSM. I see you have added a postcode node to a road. That's not how we use postcodes in OSM. We add postcodes to objects, such as buildings, usually as part of the whole address. Postcodes can't be added to a road, because multiple postcodes can apply to a single road, even with different postcodes on opposite sides of the road. Postcodes sometimes only apply to a single building. You can see a postcode overlay (that I maintain) here: http://onspd.raggedred.net/ I hope you add some buildings with their postcodes in your area. If you need help, please feel free to ask. |
35844893 | over 9 years ago | Please stop creating these road relations. They will be deleted - they are of no use in the UK and make later editing much harder. |
35844297 | over 9 years ago | This is another route relation for a UK road. Route relations for UK roads are not required. They add complexity that is not needed. Please stop adding route relations for UK roads. Please revert this edit or delete the route relation. |
35844110 | over 9 years ago | You are still adding route relations for UK roads. You have been asked to stop doing this. Please stop adding these relations. Please revert this edit ASAP. If you do not reply I will start deleting the route relations you are adding. You need to engage with other mappers if you do not want your controversial edits deleted, OSM is a collaborative community. There are people now calling for you to be banned. It is time that you engaged with the community or stop making controversial edits. |
35737307 | over 9 years ago | Route relation deleted osm.org/changeset/35812131 |
35777209 | over 9 years ago | Welcome to OSM. I see you have added a postcode to a street. In OSM we add the addressing details to objects such as a building, not to a street. Many streets in the UK have multiple postcodes, sometimes properties on opposite sides of a street have different postcodes. If you have any questions about OSM, please feel free to ask. |
35737307 | over 9 years ago | Once again another contentious edit from abc26324. Why do you make these pointless edits? We do not need or use road relations in the UK. All UK roads can only have one reference, with no braids or overlaps, so road relations are not needed. Please revert this edit ASAP |
35582900 | over 9 years ago | And doubling the number of tracks for no reason is not misleading? I've heard enough. Life is too short to argue about this. |
35582900 | over 9 years ago | Ah, so you're tagging for the renderer! |
35582900 | over 9 years ago | What does the wiki have to do with sensible, logical tagging? |
35660349 | over 9 years ago | You have added passenger_lines=2 in places where the two tracks are already drawn separately. This implies there are four tracks (2 x 2) when there are only 2. I think this needs correcting. |
35653117 | over 9 years ago | This is an undiscussed mass edit. Please revert it now. |
35636404 | over 9 years ago | Welcome to OSM. I wonder if know you have shared your edit with the 2 million people who are part of OSM :-) We tend to use the name tag for for named objects such as road names, business names etc. If you need any help please reply here. |
35547824 | over 9 years ago | I don't think you have used highway=tertiary correctly. Changing so many small parts to tertiary doesn't make sense. In the UK tertiary roads are roads that connect places together but are not A or B roads. |