Once again, these are probably not named as 'Public Open Space' on a name board. Only use the name tag if there really is a name. You can define the access with access tags, e.g. access=public

Welcome to OSM

Thanks for the detail.

You have made a common beginner mistake of using the name tag to describe something. The footway probably doesn't have a name board with 'Footpath' on it. Thinks don't have to have a name.

Welcome to OSM

Thanks for the detail

Are there really two parks there, or is there just one?

reverted

sorry, *without* the separate point

I commented on the wrong changeset, but taking the four together: The last one looks fine, the first and third use a relation to draw two parts of the building that is not needed to be a relation. The building outline could be drawn in one piece then the names, address details etc added to the outline with the separate point. Having the point separate is sort of OK, but the relation is OTT.

Do you need any help to sort this out?

Welcome to OSM

Thanks for the detail

You seem to be a bit tangled in relations that you really don't need. Do you need any help sorting this out?

Welcome to OSM

I'm not sure what you are trying to do here. Why is there a link between the house on Ramsey Road to the paper on transfer western blot?

Was this an experiment that you saved witjout meaning to? Do you need any help sorting this out?

Welcome to OSM

Thanks for the detail.

You have added a large area and described it as a building (building=yes). I suggest you remove the building tag.

You have also added mad_made=works. This is for a non descript factory. Based on your comment I think I would tag this as landuse=brownfield. That is a previously used site that is now not used. It can still have a name.

HTH

Welcome to OSM

You have drawn the building to match the aerial imagery, but that is skewed by parallax. The best solution is to trace around the top of the building and then drag it to the base (we draw building footprints on the ground usually). That is what the previous mapper looks to have done. I think your edit would be best removed.

Welcome to OSM

Thanks for the detail.

You have made a common mistake and used the name tag to describe something rather than add it's name. Not all tracks have a name, so it's fine to leave it blank but it is very unlikely to be called 'Kelburn windfarm to Dalry Winfarm link'

No, but I had to open the changeset and look at the individual change to see that. If you had followed the recommended way of adding a comment to summarise the change to each upload I could have just looked at that without opening everything. That's why comments are on changeset are suggested. Looking at your editing history you never add a comment. osm.org/user/TJS/history This is not helpful to the rest of the community.

Welcome to OSM

You edit seems to have gone rather wrong. You have changed the building called Jessel House into a large circle. I will revert (undo) your edit. It looks like the only thing to change is the geometry of the building.

Hi,

You have deleted a 'network capture area'.

Do you know what a network capture area is? There are others, why did you delete this one? I want to know if the other are useful or not.

It would be helpful to othe rmappers if you would please add a short comment to each upload to summarise what the edit is for.

The UK Motorhomes website is copyright - it says so on the home page. You cannot use copyright sources without written permission that is compatible with the OSM licence. Do you have that? If not this edit will have to be deleted. We MUST be super careful about the sources we use. Please reply.

If this is a postbox, you need to simply add amenity = postbox.

You seem to have tried to outline the area of a hospital. That is a better way to describe it than the single existing point. However, your outline is very, very rough. You have included fields and what looks like a farm. Your idea is good, but you need to be much more accurate in outlining objects. If you zoom in a lot that helps with getting the detail right.

You have added an area, but not tagged it as anything. What are you trying to describe here?

Welcome to OSM

You seem to have rather messed up the recreation ground and added a park over the top of it. It looks to me that recreation ground would be the best choice and that it really isn't a park. To fix the mess, I suggest that this edit is reverted (undone). Would you like me to sort this out?