Welcome to OSM
Thanks for the details.

You have made a common beginner's mistake and used the name tag to describe the feature. I doubt that the park is called 'Park' and the playground probably isn't called 'Playground' If there is no name board or sign just leave the name tag blank.

HTH

Welcome to OSM
Thanks for the detail.
You have taken the building tag off the 'zoo' area. I'm not sure it's a zoo - it seems too small, but I haven't visited. Is it really called 'Mini Zoo'? A common mistake that beginners make is to use the name tag to hold a description. We only use the name tag for names, usually on a name board or a sign. If there is not sign the name is left blank. It is described as a zoom with the tag and we can see how small it is.

HTH

Welcome to OSM
Thanks for the detail
I think the name tag may be more of a description than a name. It is a common beginner's mistake to put too much into the name tag. We add the name that the place has on a name board or sign. If there's no such name we leave the name tag blank.

HTH

Welcome to OSM
Thanks for the detail
You have used the name tag to mark the species or genus of the tree. We only use the name tag to refer to a name given to that object, on trees a name would be very, very rare. Misunderstanding the use of name tags is a common beginner's mistake.There are tags for species, genus and taxon depending on what you can add for each tree.

HTH

You seem to have created a multipolygon. This is usually used to create a multilayered object such as a pond with an island in it. Here it is not needed and is not complete. I wonder if you were practicing with the editor and saved you test work. Would you like me to revert (undo) your edit?

SImilarly, I doubt the name of the path is Perton Feilds Walk Paths [sic]. If the path has no name on the ground, please leave the name tag blank.

Welcome to OSM
Thanks for the detail.
You have made a common beginner's error and added a description of the item as the name. I doubt the path is named 'Penk Rise Paths'. If there is no name please leave the name tag empty - most paths have no name. It is clear from its location that it is Penk Park.

HTH

Welcome to OSM

I think you have got in a bit of a muddle here. You have added a park tag to woodland, yet the underlying park encompasses the woodland. You have then added anothe rpark over the top of the whole thing.

I think this edit should be reverted (undone) to get back the stable position it was and then new edits can be added without the muddle. I will revert this edit, but would you like to describe what you were trying to do I can see if I can help.

This is a controversial mass edit by a recently-joined editor. I think this needs to be discussed before such a change. I suggest this is reverted.

Why have you made such a change? (Please reply - we need to understand what you are doing)

Welcome to OSM
Thanks for the details
You have changed a recreation ground into a park. The name (Fairmuir Park) hints at a park, but in OSM terms a green space which is mostly laid out a s sports pitched is a recreation ground (landuse-recreation_ground).

HTH

Welcome to OSM
Thanks for the detail.
We don't add address details to highways, except the name of course. We add address details to buildings or sometimes entrances.

Highway=crossing is used to show where a footway crosses a road, not for the whole road length.

HTH

I would draw an area that outlines the playground. We have a tag, leisure=playground to mark that too. By being separate you can add it's own tags, e.g. name.

In OSM terms any green space that is mostly laid out with sports pitches is a recreation ground. It is a fine line. The name suggests the ambiguity. Looking again I would make it a rec, but it's not my local area.

Welcome to OSM
Fairfield Recreation Ground is not a park it is a recreation ground - the clue is in the name. I have removed the extra park you added and altered the existing rec's name

Welcome to OSM
You have added two parks that from the aerial imagery look anything but a park. Are you sure this is right?

Welcome to OSM
Thanks for the detail
You have tagged the area as both a park and a playground. It is one or the other. The whole area might be a park and a smaller area inside that be the playground

HTH

Not quite, you took the highway tag and the surface tag off. Highway tag says what it is (not just a line) and the surface tag is very useful for walkers etc. It doesn't show on the standard render but there are many other renders that do, including personal ones that people use to load into hand-held GPS receivers

Have another try :-)

Welcome to OSM
Thanks for the detail.
You have made a very common, beginners mistake by using the name tag to describe the item. I doubt the footpath is called 'Public Footpath'. If things don't have a name (paths often don't) then we leave the name blank. If you want to mark the path as a public footpath you can add the special tag designation = public_footpath

Hi,
You seem to have turned part of Cranmore Drive into a bridge. Did you mean that? Do you need some help to sort this out?

Doggetts Park looks like a recreation ground to me.