Where was this mechanical edit discussed?
osm.wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct

So you are guessing - you haven't surveyed the area? Please don't tag for a router, it's just as bad as tagging for the renderer.

I feel this would be better to be reverted.

It's a canal. All kinds of boat are welcome. What sign on the ground are you using to add this tag?

These canals have British Waterways as the operator, but that was replaced by Canal & River Trust in 2012.

Is there really an an area of industrial landuse in the North Sea? This looks like "tagging for the renderer" to me, as your changeset comment suggests. osm.wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer

This appears to be a world-wide mass edit. Was this discussed and agreed before you made this edit?

I'm rather concerned about this changeset. You seem to have replaced all of the carefully surveyed 'Y and 'T' road ends with turning circles. These are certainly not turning circles. I would like to revert this edit to reinstate the accuracy of the road ends.

Does the footpath really have a sign saying ELM GROVE FOOTPATH TO QUEENSMEAD? The from and to is obvious from it's geometry. If the path does have this odd name it would be customary to make it mixed case not all caps.

I'm sure the farm here osm.org/way/55464270 is not really called Peterfromtheeast

Please add comments to your changesets so people reviewing them have a clue wht you are trying to do.

If you are going to take the trouble to add farms, why not add the area of the farmyard as landuse=farmyard and name that? Maybe that doesn't fit your editing style which seem to be blindly copying farm names from some other, unnamed, source

This editor does this kind of duplication often. I believe this should be reverted.

this needs reverting

This looks like a doodle, or possibly worse. A revert is needed I think

Is the postbox really in the middle of the road? :-)

The document you quote has no licence info in it, so that means it is copyright. Do you have a licence or written agreement to use this data?

Welcome to OSM.
I wonder what the area is for that you have added? It doesn't appear to coincide with anything on the aerial imagery.
You need add a tag or tags to describe what the area is that you have created.

I reverted the edit, except that I kept the new church node.

Welcome to OSM
You seem to have deleted High Street and a residential landuse area. I guess you didn't mean to do that. I suggest your edit is reverted to put these deletions back. I'll revert these mistakes unless there's a reason to remove them.
Mistakes like this occur, especially with new editors, but as you see mistakes can be corrected.

You seem to have added a route name to a small section of the route. That particular footpath not the Chesterfield Round Walk, it is only part of it.
You need to create a relation for the whole route, that can then have the name and any other properties for the route. Then add each of the sections to the route relation. That way a road or path that does have a name that is different from the route can be named and two or more routes that share a path or road can each be named separately (in their relations) and not conflict.
If you need help or more information please reply and I'll try to help.