chillly's Comments
Changeset | When | Comment |
---|---|---|
49875534 | about 8 years ago | reverted |
49875555 | about 8 years ago | reverted |
49875677 | about 8 years ago | reverted |
49902482 | about 8 years ago | Please stop adding this rubbish or will have your account suspended. If you want to add real stuff, please do, but not this rubbish. |
49902344 | about 8 years ago | This looks to be rubbish. Did you mean to save this? Do you need any help cleaning this up or would you like me to revert (undo) it? |
49899650 | about 8 years ago | OK |
49899650 | about 8 years ago | Welcome to OSM
Of course public rights of way do exist over otherwise private land. Would you like me to restore the path so you can mark it as private? If you have any questions please feel free to ask. |
49724373 | about 8 years ago | @SomeoneElse you're right, time to remove the junk |
49841536 | about 8 years ago | OK, I will revert (undo) this edit. If you need any help, feel free to ask. |
49841536 | about 8 years ago | Narnia? This looks like some kind of joke or testing. Maybe you didn't expect that your edit would be shared publically, but it is. Would you like some help sorting this out? |
49769444 | about 8 years ago | mapping landuse boundaries to the centre lines of roads is not good practice. Your explanation sounds good, but in practice we don't do it. Creating a map image is only one use of OSM data and whatever your renderer of choice does to make the result neatest is not a good justification. A park, or any other landuse, does not extend to the centre of a road. There is an edge before the road begins. At that edge there may be a fence, a kerb, a footway or whatever. If you insist on there being a boundary between two landuse features (which seems pedantic) you could add landuse=highway to describe the extent of the land set aside for the highway and all its features.
|
49747398 | about 8 years ago | The Royal Mail's view of addresses can be very obscure and certainly only one company's version of things. I'd use Molescroft. |
49747398 | about 8 years ago | Looking at this again, Is Church Road in Beverley or Molescroft? If it is Molescroft then the addr:city should be Molescroft. The term 'city' is a bit confusing. It gets used for any place, so the houses in a village would get addr:city set to the village name. |
49747398 | about 8 years ago | Welcome to OSM. Thanks for the edit. I have a couple of comments. It would be usual to use building=house when you know it's a house. Postcodes have a space in them: HU17 7EN. Postcodes are especially useful for routing and satnavs, so getting the format right helps. If you have any questions please feel free to ask. |
49724373 | about 8 years ago | Welcome to OSM
I think this needs to be removed as a restaurant. |
49618977 | about 8 years ago | Welcome to OSM.
To show a route overlay on an OSM map you might like to look at http://umap.openstreetmap.fr |
49596372 | about 8 years ago | Welcome to OSM, thanks for the detail. We normally use the name tag on buildings for business names and use the address housename tag for the building name. Adding extra address info, such as postcode, is also helpful. You could have added the housename tag to the building outline, but some people do add a point as you have done, especially if a building has multiple properties within it. if you need help, please feel free to ask |
49541036 | about 8 years ago | Welcome to OSM.
Hope that helps. |
49525224 | about 8 years ago | Welcome to OSM.
I will change the recreation ground. |
49462784 | about 8 years ago | Welcome to OSM. Thanks for your edit. OSM is not a business directory but we welcome people who add business detail. The details are useful (description borders on an ad :-)) but you have missed off the most important tag: what is this? Is it a shop, an office, a craft ... Please feel free to ask if you need help. |