If the trees have a conservation reference you might like to add a ref tag. adding a second part to make it clear what the reference is for, so a tree preservation order reference might be ref:tpo=xxxx
HTH

Welcome to OSM.

You have used the name tag to describe the trees you have added. Name is used for a displayed name, such as a shop name or road name. To describe an oak tree you should use genus=quercus. If you know which species of oak you can use the species tag instead, e.g. English oak would use species=quercus robur.

If you have any questions or need any help, please feel free to ask.

If you questions, feel free to send me a message and I'll try to help.

Yes, I can revert the edit. Mistakes like this happen for people new to OSM, which is why I asked.

Don't be put off by this, feel free to edit, especially adding paths you have followed in remote areas like this. They are useful to others.

The path will be back in a few minutes.

Hi Welcome to OSM.

Your first edit deletes a footpath that has been in OSM for many years, this is worrying. Did you mean to delete the path? Are you sure the path should be deleted? Do you need any help with this?

I strongly object to this retagging of cycleways to highway:path. This is NOT the way it is done ion the UK. Please don't do any more retagging of cycleways like this.

I wonder why you have chosen to use the highway:path & designated style. This is not the way this tends to be tagged in the UK. A cycleway would be highway=cycleway, possibly with foot=yes, and a footpath would be highway:footway. You could add designation:public_footpath if it was signed so.

Do you plan to change any other cycleways and footpaths to this scheme (I hope not)?

reverted by changeset 34515956

Reverted by changeset 34515861

You seem to be deleting roads. Why are you doing this. This is not a private view for you, you are deleting other people's hard work.

I will be restoring these deleted roads

ou seem to have deleted a large number of residential roads. Did you mean to do this? Do you need any help to recover this?

You seem to be splitting roads into two parts. Why? Your comment indicates a restriction but you are not adding any restrictions. Please stop splitting roads without a reason.

I believe this business is called Hing Hua, not Hing Hua Chinese Takeaway. Please don't mix the name and the type of business in the name tag.

I believe this is call Orchard Court, not Orchard Court Residential Care Home. Mixing the purpose in with the name field is not a good thing at all. Please use the name for the actual name as displayed at the site.

Please changeset comments to your many edits. Finding a specific edit is hard amongst many with no comment.

The makes it look as the the Toyota company operates here, but I doubt very much that Toyota is based here. I think this is a car dealer that sells Toyota cars. The name field should have the name displayed at the site - I think this is John Roe, not the name of the car brands sold there.

I think the dock has changed since the imagery was taken as Siemens are altering the dock as path of the Greenport Hull development. This edit may need reverting.

Great to see your edits. In this case the thing you have added a name to is the landuse. I would have added a building (traced from the aerial images) then add the name and add a tag for a shop hardware (our international description of an ironmonger). If you need help, please ask.

This edit has added second station node at stations. There is only one station so there should only be one station in OSM. osm.wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element

You really need to take a look at how the change you have made is affecting stations. Please read osm.wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element
Then take a look at osm.wiki/Tag:railway=station

Adding the second track is OK, but you have duplicated the stations. There is only one Ferriby station (for example), yet there are two station nodes. We only add each real-world object once into OSM.