OpenStreetMap Logo OpenStreetMap

E-Mail-Symbol Bluesky-Symbol Facebook-Symbol LinkedIn-Symbol Mastodon-Symbol Telegramm-Symbol X-Symbol

Diskussion

Kommentar von stevage am 17. Juni 2011 um 00:56 Uhr

Nice fine print there. "Quit whining. Even though all your nearmap-sourced contributions will be deleted when OSM goes ODBL, you should rejoice in the fact that you can at least tick a box. Hundreds of hours of work deleted, but you get to TICK A BOX."

Or maybe I'm misunderstanding you.

Kommentar von chriscf am 17. Juni 2011 um 01:45 Uhr

Weren't you at one point going around saying WAAAAAAAAAAH I TRACED FROM NEARMAP I WON'T BE ALLOWED TO MAP ANYMORE WAAAAAAAAAAH? That's rather more drastic than just saying "Oh my, some of the features I have added will have to be deleted."

So it looks like maybe we lose some data somewhere. OH SHIT THE SKY IS FALLING IN WE'RE ALL DOING TO DIE IT'S THE END OF THE WORLD AS WE KNOW IT. Data is the product. Like all businesses, sometimes you have to write off some stock. Thankfully, we still have the means of production.

Find out who got agreement to allow us to trace CC-BY-SA data came at least a full year after the first hints that a change might have been on the cards. Go bitch to them for having allowed you to waste hundreds of hours tracing stuff that we might have had to get rid of anyway.

Kommentar von lyx am 17. Juni 2011 um 02:25 Uhr

Well, it would be nice of users on all sides of the license debate to acknowledge that the people on the other side are just mappers like yourself and working on improving the OSM project.
Regarding nearmap-derived data: Please have a look at the thread starting at http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/legal-talk/2011-June/006160.html
That should hopefully clarify the situation.

Kommentar von asciipip am 17. Juni 2011 um 11:12 Uhr

The email you link to says the exact opposite of your small text--NearMap-derived OSM contributions made before June 17th will *not* be removed from the ODbL OSM data (assuming you have also agreed to the ODbL+CTs).

Kommentar von nm7s9 am 18. Juni 2011 um 08:55 Uhr

asciiphil is correct. No Nearmap derived contribution need to be removed, ever.

However, if a disgruntled user insists that their contributions (whether Nearmap derived or not) must be deleted from OSM, their data has to go.

Once the CT's are enforced, users will never be able to do this to the project again.

Anmelden, um einen Kommentar zu schreiben