Logo de OpenStreetMap OpenStreetMap

Ícono de correo electrónico Icono de Bluesky Ícono de Facebook Ícono de LinkedIn Ícono de Mastodon Ícono de Telegram Ícono X

Discusión

Comentario de stevage el 17 de junio de 2011 a las 00:56

Nice fine print there. "Quit whining. Even though all your nearmap-sourced contributions will be deleted when OSM goes ODBL, you should rejoice in the fact that you can at least tick a box. Hundreds of hours of work deleted, but you get to TICK A BOX."

Or maybe I'm misunderstanding you.

Comentario de chriscf el 17 de junio de 2011 a las 01:45

Weren't you at one point going around saying WAAAAAAAAAAH I TRACED FROM NEARMAP I WON'T BE ALLOWED TO MAP ANYMORE WAAAAAAAAAAH? That's rather more drastic than just saying "Oh my, some of the features I have added will have to be deleted."

So it looks like maybe we lose some data somewhere. OH SHIT THE SKY IS FALLING IN WE'RE ALL DOING TO DIE IT'S THE END OF THE WORLD AS WE KNOW IT. Data is the product. Like all businesses, sometimes you have to write off some stock. Thankfully, we still have the means of production.

Find out who got agreement to allow us to trace CC-BY-SA data came at least a full year after the first hints that a change might have been on the cards. Go bitch to them for having allowed you to waste hundreds of hours tracing stuff that we might have had to get rid of anyway.

Comentario de lyx el 17 de junio de 2011 a las 02:25

Well, it would be nice of users on all sides of the license debate to acknowledge that the people on the other side are just mappers like yourself and working on improving the OSM project.
Regarding nearmap-derived data: Please have a look at the thread starting at http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/legal-talk/2011-June/006160.html
That should hopefully clarify the situation.

Comentario de asciipip el 17 de junio de 2011 a las 11:12

The email you link to says the exact opposite of your small text--NearMap-derived OSM contributions made before June 17th will *not* be removed from the ODbL OSM data (assuming you have also agreed to the ODbL+CTs).

Comentario de nm7s9 el 18 de junio de 2011 a las 08:55

asciiphil is correct. No Nearmap derived contribution need to be removed, ever.

However, if a disgruntled user insists that their contributions (whether Nearmap derived or not) must be deleted from OSM, their data has to go.

Once the CT's are enforced, users will never be able to do this to the project again.

Iniciar sesión para dejar un comentario