source;*, Bing

"I know there is no need for tagging a hamlet or village as residential area. This also to improve visibility."

Could you elaborate, actually? Ignore the comment I made regarding this part.

"I know there is no need for tagging a hamlet or village as residential area. This also to improve visibility."

I did not specifically comment on this, but I think I might understand your point. I'll look into where the limit is on adding residential areas.

"I am working on it to check the traces of the highways which have often a serious offset and adjust them where it is necessary ."
In some countries, they truely are incorrectly offset and in most places they might not be accurate enough, or too accurate in fact.
In other areas, such as Haiti, a lot of roads were drawn using higher resolution imagery (in this case also drone imagery), which is likely on the correct offset. (You should already know how to handle this;
osm.wiki/Using_Imagery#Binding_objects )

"You are correct that I overlooked some buildings. I corrected that."
Don't feel obliged to map every building in the bush while your validating though.

"What is your function on this project?"
I'm a mapper and give feedback from time to time. I'm not with any group or organization.

Hey Frans,

You should map objects not specified in the task outside of said task. This speeds up validation. Mapping residential areas was not specified for mappers or validators.

Feedback: It looks like some of these isolated dwelling nodes were placed haphazardly.

For instance, have a look at osm.org/node/9013818595/history
It is right next to other buildings -which you also assigned such a node to-, which are next to unmapped buildings, which in turn are right across from a plot which is part of a hamlet which you have mapped.
There is almost no land, let alone a plot, seperating these buildings from each other. Are each and every one of them isolated dwellings?

(If you have found something which is an isolated dwelling -1 or 2 buildings-, it only needs one node.
osm.wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element )

Make sure you're zoomed in enough so all objects are visible, compare with other imagery layers (here, Maxar) so you can see unmapped objects and check the tags' wiki pages, e.g.
osm.wiki/Tag:place%3Disolated_dwelling
("[...] outside other settlements [...] form by themselves a settlement [...] must not consist of more than 2 households [...] For bigger settlements use another tag")

Regards,

Daniel

Hey johanemilsson,

If you would like to map anything not specified in a HOT task, please do so outside of said task.
This makes it faster for mappers to map the task and easier for validators looking at changes.

Regards,

Daniel

Hey Hassan Abdulsalam,

osm.org/way/974775308
This building outline is way smaller than you have mapped it and includes 2 seperate, white buildings. The colors here are clearly different and the surface color is similar around it. You can check your mapping with Maxar. It can be found in the right tab (layer menu).
You did correctly align to Mapbox, btw.

Regards,

Daniel

PS: I have not reviewed your other changes, but the ones I've seen look okay.

*and removed invalid building.

Hey Niall_Kerr,

Please use and align to Mapbox. You can find it in the right sidebar (layer menu). You can switch to other imagery (Maxar) to check your mapping.

Regards,

Daniel

-
Bonjour schneider,

Utiliser et aligner sur Mapbox, s'il-vous-plaît. Vous pouvez le trouver dans le menu des couches (barre latérale droite). Vous pouvez passer à d'autres couches d'imagerie pour vérifier votre cartographie.

Salutations,

Daniel

Hey schneider,

Please use and align to Mapbox. You can find it in the layer menu (right sidebar). You can switch to other imagery layers to check your mapping.

Regards,

Daniel

What license are these layers using exactly?

And, what about the Lidar and Contour layers?
Can we also use those in OpenStreetMap? If so, under the same license?

Hey PierZen,

What layers (it's CNIGS, btw) are you using exactly? What license and geographical extent does this have and would you have a link for the custom layers in iD and/or JOSM?

The existing links for CNIGS imagery through openstreetmap.fr don't seem to work anymore.

You did seem to have a compare website set up for both the 2014-2015 and 2016 imagery yourself, but the imagery layers no longer show up there neither.

Regards,

Daniel

Vaya a http://learnosm.org/ y aprenda a cuadrar edificios.

-

Welcome back to OpenStreetMap,

Go to http://learnosm.org/ and learn how to square buildings.

Happy mapping!

Regards,

Daniel

Hallo en welkom CycleDreams,

Feedback: Voor openingstijden i.p.v. "Dinsdag tot en met zaterdag" graag de juiste tagging gebruiken. Deze kan je hier vinden:
osm.wiki/Key:opening_hours#Simple_examples
(Dinsdag en donderdag kan je met een comma groeperen zoals wordt uitgelegd.)

De meeste tags kan je op de wiki vinden.
osm.wiki/wiki/

Hey and welcome aziwoqpd,

Looks good. This park is already visible on Maxar -and Esri- (see right sidebar in editor for imagery layers). You can draw it as an area, though it may still be better to wait for it to be finished of course.

Anyhow, Maxar is newer and can be better sometimes in this region. Maxar Premium is currently down, it will be restored at a later time.

Regards,

Daniel

Hey Lars and welcome,

First, I would appreciate a reply. This way we know you are reading your changeset comments.

Feedback...

...regarding the river:
We add names on the way, not the area. Unfortunately, the river way was not continued or supplied with a fixme by the last mapper. You can find it here:
osm.org/way/503402129/history

The river way should be drawn as the centerline of the river.

...regarding Borgestadholmen:
This is already added as a relation and seems to appear correctly in a search
osm.org/relation/10489563/history

By connecting the additional area to the coastline, you have also broken the rendering of the island.

...regarding the random nodes:
You seem to have added a node to at least 3 objects by accident.

If so, you should remove these nodes.
(Sidenote: I see there's some issues with this forest overlapping the river, as it is imported data.)

You can always mark a changeset for review when you save it.

However, I think it may be better to revert this changeset if all of the above is true.

Regards,

Daniel

Beste Cothen,

Ik heb leisure=playground voor je toegevoegd bij beide speelplaatsen..

Weet je zeker dat dit een playground=structure is, net zoals die aan de andere kant? Lijken me verschillende kleinere onderdelen.

Groet,

Daniel

Beste Cohen,

"CAROLUSSCHOOL" lijkt me niet volledig in hoofdletters geschreven ;)

Groet,

Daniel

Beste Cothen,

Lijkt erop dat je per ongeluk een node (punt) hebt toegevoegd aan een gebouw verderop.
Als dit zo is kan je de node zelf verwijderen.
osm.org/node/8998868698

De geometrie komt uit de BAG en passen we normaal niet zelf aan. Fouten melden we terug bij de BAG.
Overigens zijn veel gebouwen simpelweg nog niet ingemeten.

Groet,

Daniel

Beste Cothen,

De source tag is ietwat ouderwets. Tegenwoordig voldoet in principe de "source" (bron) in the vullen bij de changeset wanneer je 'm opslaat, behalve als het een import betreft.
Je kunt invullen "local knowledge", "survey" of bv. "PDOK aerial imagery Beeldmateriaal.nl 25cm latest" (deze staat al bij "imagery_used", maar dit komt soms niet overeen met welke je echt gebruikt hebt indien je meerdere lagen gebruikt.)
Je bent verder vrij de tag wel/niet te gebruiken.

Groet,

Daniel