OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
141034243 3 months ago

These are foundations of demolished buildings, not ones for new to be constructed buildings.
Resolved in
osm.org/changeset/165144571
Marked them as demolished and the area as brownfield.

164936269 3 months ago

What is the source for your changes?

See osm.wiki/Verifiability

There seems to be no physical signage for such a route at this location
https://api.panoramax.xyz/#pic=cb6b6972-9f29-4845-8b4a-2a242102a435&focus=pic

only for the cycleway itself, which is already mapped as a way. See
osm.wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element

164937695 3 months ago

What is the source for your changes?

See osm.wiki/Verifiability#Planned_features

163217556 5 months ago

article used for previous changeset only, not for this one.

160735391 6 months ago

Thanks. Yes, that makes sense.

160735391 6 months ago

Hey PluMGMK,

Are you sure it is this pole?

It looks like you meant this one.
osm.org/node/12459264558

Regards,

Daniel

161250486 7 months ago

osm.org/way/842361171
Is it explicitly signed as "Bell Tower"? It seems like descriptive name. It is already correctly tagged as
tower:type=bell_tower
I would suggest removing name tag.

161250164 7 months ago

Are these low walls or full-height walls (up to ceiling)?
For full-height wall there is indoor=wall.
osm.wiki/Tag:indoor=wall
(ignore image on the right, this is wood frame inside certain walls)

161148922 7 months ago

changeset comment should be
"changed playground seesaw node to line".

112028898 7 months ago

Hey Brian,

Some objects seem to be duplicated.

Ex.
osm.org/relation/13285410/history
looks like a duplicate of
osm.org/relation/13281077/history
(taken from edit view at this point);
osm.org/node/9137759200

Regards,

Daniel

147371296 7 months ago

Added in
osm.org/changeset/160413994

147371309 7 months ago

Added in
osm.org/changeset/160413994

147069291 7 months ago

Added in
osm.org/changeset/160413994

160239137 8 months ago

Added KK024-01300(1,2) in
osm.org/changeset/160284245

160239137 8 months ago

Hey Learscail,

I would not recommend adding historical objects during your first edits, but you are welcome to do so.

Unfortunately, we can not use the SMR as sole source for adding objects. The SMR and layers available on the Historic Environment Viewer (HEV) are a proprietary/copyright source and OpenStreetMap does not have permission to use them.

In order to add these objects, you will need another source to verify they exist.

We have permission to use the following layers

- Layers available in OSM editors such as the one you are using.
(which I commented on earlier)

- NLS historic maps
https://maps.nls.uk/os/#ireland

- Esri World Imagery Wayback
(of which most current and oldest are available in the editor)
https://livingatlas.arcgis.com/wayback/#active=60013&mapCenter=-7.16811%2C52.61855%2C15

You can go outdoors and survey one to see if it is physically present, but most won't be visible (have been plough-levelled).
You can then add a source "survey" when saving your changes.

If you know or someone else knows about their existence you can add them with source "local knowledge of (myself, resident, employee, etc)" on saving your changes.

If there is a centuries old map/book in the library ('out of copyright') you can add the source as
"Book X, chapter Y, author Z"
(though this is preferably left to advanced contributors)

If you can't verify them in one of these ways, they are unverifiable and can't be added to OpenStreetMap.

---

osm.org/way/538299207
KK024-011 is larger than mapped but the outermost ditch is only partially visible on aerial imagery.
It might not be quite circular.

For the enclosures in the meadows
KK024-159 might be visible on regular Esri but is deemed uncertain in SMR.
KK024-013001 is faintly visible.
KK024-013002 is clearly visible.
The enclosures in the meadows seem to be visible on regular Esri,

---

This changeset has been reverted in
osm.org/changeset/160248638

Regards,

Daniel

160238267 8 months ago

Hey Learscail,

I have realigned these trees to the proper aerial imagery layer for you.
If anything looks odd, that is because the map has not fully updated for you yet.
Try refreshing your cache with
(Ctrl +)(Shift +)F5
depending on your browser.
It may take some time and a few refreshes before the map updates.

Ref this changeset
osm.org/changeset/160247176

You can see the changes here
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=160247176

Regards,

Daniel

160238398 8 months ago

Hey Learscail,

Try using the proper aerial imagery layer for the Kilkenny city area.
Don't worry, it is a common mistake.
See my reply to your first changeset.
osm.org/changeset/160237685

(Or, click your profile picture in the top right and go to Profile => Edit history to see your changesets)

---

This changeset has been reverted in
osm.org/changeset/160248253

You can see your changes here
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=160238398

Regards,

Daniel

160238380 8 months ago

Hey Learscail,

Try using the proper aerial imagery layer for the Kilkenny city area.
Don't worry, it is a common mistake.
See my reply to your first changeset.
osm.org/changeset/160237685

(Or, click your profile picture in the top right and go to Profile => Edit history to see your changesets)

---

This changeset has been reverted in
osm.org/changeset/160248253

You can see your changes here
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=160238380

Regards,

Daniel

160238020 8 months ago

Hey Learscail,

Try using the proper aerial imagery layer for the Kilkenny city area.
Don't worry, it is a common mistake.
See my reply to your first changeset.
osm.org/changeset/160237685

(Or, click your profile picture in the top right and go to Profile => Edit history to see your changesets)

---

This changeset has been reverted in
osm.org/changeset/160248253

You can see your changes here
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=160238020

Regards,

Daniel

160237685 8 months ago

Hey ,

Thank you for contributing to OpenStreetMap.

If you need any help or want to chat, you can join the OSM Ireland community on Telegram
https://t.me/+VNKHmdvvs3qOGTq4

Other contact channels are listed here, but may be less active.
https://openstreetmap.community/?map=52.65072,-7.25232&zoom=5.21

---

Regarding your changes in this changeset;
They look okay. It seems you know how to square features already (right click => square, or "Q" key) and have added a capacity tag.
A few values weren't correct but this is understandable. In the future, try verifying with street level imagery (see below).
The areas ended up with the 'parking space' tag instead of the 'streetside parking' so be careful what you choose/copy.
(If you tried selecting a parking area to copy tags you likely ran into this issue. It has been resolved and will be released at a later time.
https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/10320
)

In the iD editor (the browser editor you are using), go to the right sidebar and look at these menus:
- Layers: For the Kilkenny city area, use Esri Clarity. Regular Esri is newer, but less well aligned. It can be used outside Kilkenny's ring road.
Bing is used in other areas of the country, e.g. east of the river Barrow.
- Data Layers: Below the Layers menu is the Data Layers menu. If you scroll down, it lists street level imagery. For Kilkenny city area, Mapillary and Panoramax are available (some of which is duplicate). Elsehwere, only Bing Streetside might be available.

OpenStreetMap has permission to use these layers. Proprietary/copyright sources are prohibited unless OpenStreetMap has explicit permission to use them. Google Maps / Street View are explicitly prohibited by the way.

Furthermore, have a look at this list of editor applications. Feel free to try them out as well.
osm.wiki/Editors#Most_used_Editors
JOSM is especially useful for more advanced editing.

Happy mapping.

Regards,

Daniel