OpenStreetMap
today, there is a spam-entry over 2,5 hours online. this is to long. such entries must be deleted within some minutes.
there must be a change in the diary against the spam: spam-button or something like this, will be a solution... p.e. if 3 people mark an entry as spam, it should be deleted automatically.
I don't think,this should be so a big work to realize a solution like this.
토론
2010년 3월 16일 10:12에 efred님의 의견
oups... sorry, it's just 1,5 hour... but it's still to long!
2010년 3월 16일 10:35에 drlizau님의 의견
there are several, all from the same source, which makes it worse
2010년 3월 16일 10:35에 drlizau님의 의견
there are several, all from the same source, which makes it worse
2010년 3월 16일 11:23에 Mikrokosmonaut님의 의견
What about that only active mappers are allowed to blog? No data upload, no blog.
2010년 3월 16일 11:27에 pavithrans님의 의견
*No data upload, no blog* LOL good one :)
What about someone who after a long time thinks to do some mapping today writes his plan ?
2010년 3월 16일 11:41에 daveemtb님의 의견
Yeah, this is really getting to me. We need a "report spam" button ASAP. Perhaps it should hide the entry once a few different users have clicked it, until an admin has checked it.
"No data upload, no blog" could backfire, I had thought about this one a few days ago - it might lead to a malicious DB change just to permit spamming. This is worse problem than spam IMHO.
2010년 3월 16일 13:01에 bahnpirat님의 의견
What about this: If 10 different users click on the "spam-button" in 12 hours it get's deleted automaticly. Otherwise it stays in. But allowing every user to delete entries of every other would be a bad idea for me.
2010년 3월 16일 13:45에 TomH님의 의견
If it's not such a big work then I look forward to receiving your patch to implement it.
Note however that we will not be deploying anything that lets stuff be deleted automatically at the whim on N users (for any value of N).
2010년 3월 16일 16:14에 marcschneider님의 의견
@TomH: makes sense, I'm against a system where the crowd can delete other posts too... but what about just hiding them based on user voting? then the ones currently removing the spam can review them and finally delete the post and its author, or - if the system gets abused by users - kick the voters arses!