OpenStreetMap
today, there is a spam-entry over 2,5 hours online. this is to long. such entries must be deleted within some minutes.
there must be a change in the diary against the spam: spam-button or something like this, will be a solution... p.e. if 3 people mark an entry as spam, it should be deleted automatically.
I don't think,this should be so a big work to realize a solution like this.
بحث مباحثہ
16 March 2010تے 10:12دے بارے efred دی رائے
oups... sorry, it's just 1,5 hour... but it's still to long!
16 March 2010تے 10:35دے بارے drlizau دی رائے
there are several, all from the same source, which makes it worse
16 March 2010تے 10:35دے بارے drlizau دی رائے
there are several, all from the same source, which makes it worse
16 March 2010تے 11:23دے بارے Mikrokosmonaut دی رائے
What about that only active mappers are allowed to blog? No data upload, no blog.
16 March 2010تے 11:27دے بارے pavithrans دی رائے
*No data upload, no blog* LOL good one :)
What about someone who after a long time thinks to do some mapping today writes his plan ?
16 March 2010تے 11:41دے بارے daveemtb دی رائے
Yeah, this is really getting to me. We need a "report spam" button ASAP. Perhaps it should hide the entry once a few different users have clicked it, until an admin has checked it.
"No data upload, no blog" could backfire, I had thought about this one a few days ago - it might lead to a malicious DB change just to permit spamming. This is worse problem than spam IMHO.
16 March 2010تے 13:01دے بارے bahnpirat دی رائے
What about this: If 10 different users click on the "spam-button" in 12 hours it get's deleted automaticly. Otherwise it stays in. But allowing every user to delete entries of every other would be a bad idea for me.
16 March 2010تے 13:45دے بارے TomH دی رائے
If it's not such a big work then I look forward to receiving your patch to implement it.
Note however that we will not be deploying anything that lets stuff be deleted automatically at the whim on N users (for any value of N).
16 March 2010تے 16:14دے بارے marcschneider دی رائے
@TomH: makes sense, I'm against a system where the crowd can delete other posts too... but what about just hiding them based on user voting? then the ones currently removing the spam can review them and finally delete the post and its author, or - if the system gets abused by users - kick the voters arses!