Reverted in 26921387 due to vandalism.

This changeset looks like it contains a large number of bogus edits and will be reverted.

This is a plain address node (not a POI). What is this and what is the source?

Reverted in changeset 26921278 due to obvious spam (doesn't speak well to the product/website either, if that's how they have to drum up business).

Reverted in changeset 26863091

This is a nice addition to OSM, but I'm not sure what it is. What *is* the South Regional Council of Governments?

Is it an office? maybe office=government ?

Welcome to the project! These are some great edits!

One thing you could do to make them even better would be that when you hit Save, to add a little comment about what you did.

I see. That being the case, I think these changesets associated with this import need reverting. It would be best if ViriatoLusitano reverted these changesets.

Can you please agree to do that?

This changeset has been reverted in changesets 26855912 and 26857006

Has this import gone through the Import Guidelines as per: osm.wiki/Import_guidelines

I don't see a discussion on the imports list about it.

Tem esta importação atravessou as Diretrizes de importação como por: osm.wiki/Import_guidelines

Eu não vejo uma discussão sobre a lista de importações sobre o assunto.

Reverted in changeset 26843670

This is also an automated edit, which as per osm.wiki/Mechanical_Edit_Policy is not allowed without discussion with the community.

Please do not make such automated edits in the future.

Any time you're copying data from one source to another, it's an import and needs go to through the Import Guidelines: osm.wiki/Import/Guidelines

You (and the other Bitcoin mappers) need to understand that this is not alright from a variety of standpoints. I'm going to go ahead and revert your changesets- just as myself, not involving the Data Working Group, but you folks (the entire Bitcoin community) need to find a way to work with OSM in a way that meets our mapping requirements.

I'm asking how you got the lat/longs from the addresses. It's clear that you didn't go out with a GPS to locations...

What partners? Are you telling me that there are people with GPSes at each location?

erm I mean the geo-coordinates, ie how did you geocode the addresses?

How did you get the geocoordinstes from the locations?

Reverted in changeset 26763901

What is the source of these locations?