Could you have a look at the admin relations you modified here? Since then, they are not correct any longer due to the missing osm.org/way/534126126. Besides, a piece of the road went missing between osm.org/node/1953070225 and osm.org/node/2266467105.

are there really two Rio Zios beneath each other?

Even if some boundaries are obsolete, it would be useful not to leave any incomplete boundary relations around. It would be helpful if the relations changed in this changeset would be repaired ASAP.

You added osm.org/relation/8108246 when osm.org/relation/7696233 still existed. What is the difference?

Das war mein Changeset #5000, und ich habe es NICHT gemerkt. Schande über mich.

Antwort des OP in https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=690301#p690301

Isn't Malabon an administrative entity any longer? Or why was "type=boundary" and "boundary=administrative" removed from osm.org/relation/403176? As I think it still exists, I restored these tags.

Because you deleted its admin relation (which I restored afterwards, see below)

(At least, osm.org/relation/272634 is broken now.)

This was quite incomplete, so the admin boundary is open now. Do you have any plans to close them again?

Alas, this change has made some harm to many of the affected admin boundaries, and some multipolygons as well. Could you maybe have another look at it? Thank you!

If you can't work with Bing due to it being old, then use one of the Esri satellite imageries.

Das war Unsinn. Gemeint war "Sengscheid und Reichenbrunn".

You removed the boundaries of Suipacha. Was that deliberate?

Hallo,

was ist denn mit der L 174 (osm.org/relation/5510004) passiert? Wurde die abgeschafft, oder war das ein Fehler?

Gruß,
Thomas

Desweiteren: U-Relationen korrigiert.
Wenn man Changesets schließt, passiert so was nicht… Sorry!

When forgetting to close changesets, things like these happen. Sorry for that.

What would be the correct boundary? Because without a boundary, this relation is quite pointless.

I just fixed the admin boundary relations which got interrupted by this changeset.

Is there a reason to delete parts of some boundaries?