I implore you to look through osm.wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct as this changeset (among others) seems non-conformant at first glance; see particularly its **Problematic usage** section.

While there might not be an explicit prohibition on an ad-hoc addition of an easily computable tag, adding (mechanically or otherwise) trivially computable tags tends to go against OSM philosophy, and there really should be discussion before changing the last modified date of thousands of objects, as they suddenly look like they were recently verified; please see https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=ZrvcVAPdaWI at about 9 minutes in.

Could you please provide a link for where the consensus for this seemingly mechanical edit (which lacks mechanical edit tags and wasn't created with a separate mechanical edit account) was reached?

I've removed addr:state tags during some of my manual editing per past wiki guidance, but if there's consensus for adding the tag then I'll change my behavior.

Given that these are deep inside the state's boundary, is adding the state really desireable?

Changeset description should've been:

A couple of hydrants and a link road and some lighting and poles from survey along Main Street. Other lighting and poles, all trees, and realignments from imagery.

bollards should be away from road.

Corrected in changeset 145346538.

Similarly with 165th just south of Main Street. An old note I had mentioned a stop sign there. Might've been too old.

The stops I placed on 166th at NE 4th are likely inaccurate with outdated imagery. If so then the nodes should perhaps have a note= or other tag to avoid retagging.

from survey, not imagery; trees and other street lamps from imagery.

takeover tag also from survey; probably should split close to intersections.

incomplete

osm.org/changeset/140623612

osm.org/user/goldfndr/traces/9716161

I've since confirmed trace and this map update were good.

The change of the yield location is confusing. With node 1713572090 tagged as give_way instead of node 2532291172, it looks like drivers yield only after they've already driven partway into Southcenter Parkway instead of at the triangles painted on the link road prior to the intersection.

Got a bit carried away here. Trees from imagery, most objects from previous notes.

street lamps, street cabinets, trees, hydrant from imagery

Location of gate at south of side road is confirmed. There's also a corresponding gate to the north in the obvious location.

Thank you for the improvements over my poor approximations.

A more intuitive changeset comment would be something like:

Corrected shop=clothing to shop=clothes

Changed again, close to how it was. Need to survey again.