OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
169149517 18 days ago

I would also like to ask what you are using to define these regions, as you have added several "neighbourhoods", but they are really just vague areas in reality, and you have included large areas that are not residential in a residential landuse.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169149517

168663659 27 days ago

I see you changed the phone number including it's formatting. The +1 should be included in phone numbers on OSM. osm.wiki/Key:phone

I know in the US we don't typically see the +1, but it's technically part of phone numbers and should be used for consistancy.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168663659

168652885 27 days ago

Isn't this a single building? I have seen it go up, and I'm pretty sure it's a single structure.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168652885

168029051 about 1 month ago

Hi 66ELA,

I see you requested a review for this edit. Over all it looks pretty good. I disagree on the names for a couple of the buildings. Sunny Schick shouldn't have the name on the map, since it is closed. If I remember correctly there is not even a sign still up. (I'll need to look next time I go by.) I see it still has a shop=photo tag on it I'm going to remove that tag. Shaw Law also should not have the part in the parentheses. It should just say "Shaw Law". There are a few more tags that can be added to show that it's a law office I will need to look those up in the wiki tough.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168029051

111780110 almost 4 years ago

Sorry about that Changeset comment. JOSM was acting strange and uploaded before I could finish typing.

I updated and added details to St. Felix Catholic Center. It is an Old Fransican Friary, and now it is a retreat center.

105636851 about 4 years ago

Hi, I see you have mapped a few features around the area here, and you only have 4 edits so you are new to OSM. I just wanted to welcome you to the project and say that what I have seen of your edits looks really good.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/105636851

105298159 about 4 years ago

This appears to be a house. I'm assuming the house of the person named on the point. Please don't map people's names on their houses. I am also assuming that this is not actually a bank.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/105298159

104826200 about 4 years ago

I had to double-check this edit because It looked suspicious. Although I kinda remember hearing this golf course had closed. It turns out it has and they are now building houses there. Your Changeset comment though tells your fellow mappers nothing. Please use meaningful changes set comments so that other mappers can know what you did. For instance this one could have said: "Removed old Golf Course, and added residential streets that have replaced it" or something like that. It would help other mappers a lot. Thanks.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/104826200

104620875 about 4 years ago

Why did you remove this gate? It is very much present. It might not be visible in imagery, because it is only a year old or so. They did have the gates open over this past winter, but the gates are a permanent structure. If you need proof I can go take a picture.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/104620875

103367400 over 4 years ago

Hi,

Thanks for joining Open Street Map. I've looked though several of your edits, and The only thing I noticed was what you corrected with this edit. Because the sidewalk(and Auburn road for that matter) go over the highway, and do not interact with it they should not share any nodes, and a crossing node in not needed.

I will also point out a common mistake so that you can avoid it. If you notice everything that is already mapped in an area is offset from the images it's probably actually the images that are off. You can adjust this as needed with the settings in the background options found on the right hand side of the editor.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/103367400

99650256 over 4 years ago

What is this? From what I can see it looks like it's just the middle of a field.

101570651 over 4 years ago

In this changeset you named both a house and a shed "shed". A name=* tag should only be used when a feature actually has a name. for the shed you should have just tagged it with building=shed. and no area, name, or description tags.

For the house again house don't typically have names. the building:levels=1 tag looks good, assuming it is a one story house. (it looks to me like it's a ranch so I'm assuming you are correct here)
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/101570651

101537450 over 4 years ago

Hi, I'm not really sure what you were trying to do with this edit. you ended up moving a couple of addresses to completely different houses.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/101537450

100665404 over 4 years ago

How you will want to go about it will depend on what format will make it easiest to get the map into the simulator. Is there a guide you are using for this process you could point me towards. If I can see the creation process I will better be able to help you figure out how to get the data.

100665404 over 4 years ago

Thanks, Bifferoni!

It sounds like you mapped this course for some specific use where it was still useful even though the course is gone. If you come along a similar situation in the future, I might be able to help you figure out a way of generating your map without drawing it on the main OSM map. Also I've seen you mapping a lot of other courses in the area. I love seeing anyone contributing to the map, so keep up the good work.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/100665404

100664179 over 4 years ago

Bifferoni,

This golf course has been removed from the world. it should no be on the map because it no longer exists. I understand that there are a couple of imagery options that might show the course, but that does not reflect the current reality. Please don't continue to map features that don't exist.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/100664179

100662080 over 4 years ago

Bifferoni,

You just placed a golf course in the middle of a housing addition. There was a golf course here at one point in time, but it closed a few years ago, and now they are building houses here.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/100662080

100660170 over 4 years ago

Translated? Faculty and Students mean complete opposites. Based on the layout of the grounds, this lot is probably for faculty. Faculty would be teachers, not students. The students probably park in the large main lot, around here a large number of high school students will drive themselves to school, and they greatly outnumber the teachers. I do drive by this school frequently so I might be able to check it out in person sometime.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/100660170

100589225 over 4 years ago

Russ, This golf course no longer exists. Please don't add features to the map that are no longer there.

100517591 over 4 years ago

Russ,

Looking at newer imagery it looks like the golf course is gone now, and there are a bunch of houses there now. I did find this article that talks about it. also I am local and kinda remember hearing about this closing a few years back. I might try and drive up that way and check it out in person this weekend, if you don't have any confirmation that it's still open
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/100517591