jinalfoflia's Comments
Changeset | When | Comment |
---|---|---|
38016898 | over 9 years ago | hi tilsch, You have mentioned Google Earth as a source. Can you please clarify in what context have you used Google?
|
38048828 | over 9 years ago | Hi amtingj,
|
38007848 | over 9 years ago | Hi Jjsenka, You should not be using Google as a source of information for addition or modification of any data on OSM. Look in here for more information - osm.wiki/FAQ#Why_don.27t_you_just_use_Google_Maps.2Fwhoever_for_your_data.3F
Best,
|
38029262 | over 9 years ago | Can you please add the road classification (road type) to all the roads that you have added. Thanks again! |
38029262 | over 9 years ago | Hi Asadullah Mayo, As long as you are using your local knowledge to map and not google as the source it's fine and yes welcome to OpenStreetMap! :) I have observed that you are not adding classification (type of road) to the roads that you are adding (this changeset and osm.org/changeset/38029241). You can have a look at this wiki (osm.wiki/Key:highway#Usage) to get more information about tagging the roads and also visit http://learnosm.org/en/ to learn more about OpenStreetMap. Best,
|
38030705 | over 9 years ago | Hi Greg, Is 'It's Really Here!' the name of the mast? It doesn't seem like it can be a name of the mast. Thanks,
|
37853277 | over 9 years ago | Hi,
Happy Mapping : ) |
37853277 | over 9 years ago | Hi Sanjeev,
|
37789545 | over 9 years ago | I have reverted the following changesets
These are the changesets which were touched by other users: - 37789545
I have not reverted these changesets as it might lead to other users loosing their work. Also there were changesets which had 'local knowledge' as a source along with 'bing and google', I haven't reverted them as-well. |
37744328 | over 9 years ago | Have reverted this changeset as it used 'google' as a source and in context of this comment on the changeset - osm.org/changeset/37789545 Here is the reverted changeset - osm.org/changeset/37996815 |
37781093 | over 9 years ago | Have reverted this changeset as it used 'google' as a source and in context of this comment on the changeset - osm.org/changeset/37789545 Here is the reverted changeset - osm.org/changeset/37992378 |
31305131 | over 9 years ago | Hi, I found one of your edits in this area where you have added the turn-lanes(osm.org/way/346447421/history). As per the imagery the relevant tag should be `turn:lanes:forward=left| | | |right` and not `turn:lanes:forward=left|through|through|through|right`. You can refer to our guide for mapping these turn-lanes https://github.com/mapbox/mapping/wiki/Mapping-guide-for-turn-lanes-from-imagery Also can you please make the relevant changes. Thank you! |
37789545 | over 9 years ago | Hello,
|
37851945 | over 9 years ago | That will be great. Thank you! Happy Mapping! |
37851945 | over 9 years ago | Hey AV31! Just want to tell you that you should not be using Google as a source of information for addition of any data on OSM. Look in here for more information - osm.wiki/FAQ#Why_don.27t_you_just_use_Google_Maps.2Fwhoever_for_your_data.3F Best,
|
37867532 | over 9 years ago | Hi Haseeburahman, As per your changeset comment you have mentioned Google earth as your reference source. The road don't seem to be visible in Bing or Mapbox. You should not be using Google as a source of information for addition of any data on OSM. Look in here for more information - osm.wiki/FAQ#Why_don.27t_you_just_use_Google_Maps.2Fwhoever_for_your_data.3F Best,
|
37881870 | over 9 years ago | Hi gregcrago, Can you please name the relations that you have deleted? Thank you! |
37853277 | over 9 years ago | Hi Sanjeev, I came across your edits in this changeset. Here are few points which I would like to put across: - The buildings are not orthogonalised (tools -> orthogonalize)
There is some excellent documentation about OSM here - http://learnosm.org/. You can learn more about OpenStreetMap here as-well - https://github.com/mapbox/mapping/wiki/Mapping-with-OpenStreetMap. Best, Jinal |
37789545 | over 9 years ago | Hi Famiras, You have mentioned Google as the source. Can you please clarify in what context have you used Google?
|
37838831 | over 9 years ago | Thank you!
|