OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
73327503 almost 6 years ago

Thanks for dealing with it! J

75417331 almost 6 years ago

Ah, nevermind, I see it -- just looking at the wrong imagery. Happy mapping, J

75417331 almost 6 years ago

Hi siddhaam, this service road ( osm.org/way/732639394 ) looks a little odd to me, what's the source for this?

75318172 almost 6 years ago

Hi Travelling Germans... Just wondering if this bar was supposed to be in Brooklyn instead of Manhattan... This is the only nearby bar named Skylark as far as I know: osm.org/node/2550585185

Thanks, J

73327503 almost 6 years ago

Hi zmoore!
- Your imagery_used tag says " Mapbox Satellite", which shows no sign of two-way traffic.
- You didn't mention any other data sources

On what basis did you remove the oneway restriction from Albee Square?

Thanks, jmapb

75037972 almost 6 years ago

Thanks for finding all these in a single changeset! I suspect they may all be bogus locations but I haven't been able to survey any of the supposed locations in person yet.

74603889 almost 6 years ago

Hi rivermont, thanks for adding this building -- you're fast!

I've added the height and building ID tags from the NYC dept of buildings, and standardized the address tags. Addresses in NYC generally lack city, state, and country, and instead simply have housenumber, street, and postcode. This has been the common standard here since the building and address import in 2013.

It's not wrong to add the other tags of course... but if you do, note that the addr:city tag value here would be "Brooklyn". The value of "New York" is only used within the borough of Manhattan.

Happy mapping, J

73707010 almost 6 years ago

If the building will still be using that address (1487 Broadway) it's better keep the node there and just remove the tags specific for the cafe. Otherwise we lose the fact that this address is associated with this building.

(This issue usually only comes up for corner buildings with an address on two streets, or for large muti-address buildings. Most others have address tags directly on the building itself.)

Anyway I've resurrected this node and left just the base address tags from the original building import, all good.

Happy mapping. j

73764135 almost 6 years ago

Hi ept -- what's up with these nonsense changeset comments?

73730320 almost 6 years ago

Hi, I believe from survey that this restaurant is 100% vegetarian, so the tag diet:vegetarian=only is correct. Is this untrue?

73707010 almost 6 years ago

Howdy AV... is this place just closed (ie, it might reopen as something else) or actually gone (ie,the building's been reconfigured without this storefront, or replaced with a new building altogether?)

73631982 almost 6 years ago

HI noneck, I've reverted this changeset with changeset 73958224. It looks like you were trying to add crosswalk info but accidentally modified the subway line.

73011657 almost 6 years ago

I've reverted in changeset 73931493. If there are still routing issues here, please let me know and we'll figure it out! J

73011657 almost 6 years ago

osm.org/way/60942164 really is =destination for motor vehicles -- It's not a public road but people can drive to the end of that segment and unload supplies for the picnic areas to the east. (I suppose =yes or =permissive would also work, but =destination feels most correct to me.)

Motor vehicles can't go any further than that -- but people and bicycles can, and this is the primary use of the remainder of the road, though it can be used by vehicles with a permit. (Same with the other service roads around Litchfield Villa)

Then there are the roads within the park forestry complex (44 West Drive), which are completely off limits except to park personnel.

So it really is a mix of different access types. I'm not sure what weird results you were seeing, but here's what I'm seeing now: https://imgur.com/a/bw931DK
The destination is valid, but the route is completely impossible. The correct route would be right on 8th St, right on 8th Ave, right on 3rd St, right on Prospect Park West, and then left into the park.

I'm planning to revert these access changes when I get a moment. J

73357789 almost 6 years ago

Great, I know some real estate developers around here are using some pretty hip names these days but I guess NYCHA's still a little more conservative!

73011657 almost 6 years ago

Hi Zverik -- You've changed a few service roads here to access=destination with the source listed as "Juno provider traces" but I don't see any sign of Juno activity on these roads.

Last I surveyed here all of these were signed as authorized vehicles only -- has this changed? J

73380147 almost 6 years ago

Hi MustafaD, and welcome to OpenStreetMap!

Question for you -- you seem to be naming everything you add in Manhattan some variation on "Manhattan Simit&Simit" -- two supermarkets in this changeset and also this cafe:
osm.org/node/6711055485

Offhand this seems odd that all of these things would have the same name... is this maybe a mistake?

73357789 almost 6 years ago

Hi Korzun, I see you changed the name of this NYCHA project from Ingersoll Houses to subTtile -- is this a mistake?

73285420 almost 6 years ago

Hi r_c -- I'm guessing the location of this bar is off? Probably should be somewhere around here: osm.org/node/6704294378#map=19/40.69704/-73.93470

(Looks like there's a brand new building there that hasn't been mapped yet... so much for "Old Timers"!)

73157428 almost 6 years ago

FYI I reverted the zip code to 11206. These guys have it wrong on their website -- 10221 isn't even a valid zip code!