jmapb's Comments
Changeset | When | Comment |
---|---|---|
73327503 | almost 6 years ago | Thanks for dealing with it! J |
75417331 | almost 6 years ago | Ah, nevermind, I see it -- just looking at the wrong imagery. Happy mapping, J |
75417331 | almost 6 years ago | Hi siddhaam, this service road ( osm.org/way/732639394 ) looks a little odd to me, what's the source for this? |
75318172 | almost 6 years ago | Hi Travelling Germans... Just wondering if this bar was supposed to be in Brooklyn instead of Manhattan... This is the only nearby bar named Skylark as far as I know: osm.org/node/2550585185 Thanks, J |
73327503 | almost 6 years ago | Hi zmoore!
On what basis did you remove the oneway restriction from Albee Square? Thanks, jmapb |
75037972 | almost 6 years ago | Thanks for finding all these in a single changeset! I suspect they may all be bogus locations but I haven't been able to survey any of the supposed locations in person yet. |
74603889 | almost 6 years ago | Hi rivermont, thanks for adding this building -- you're fast! I've added the height and building ID tags from the NYC dept of buildings, and standardized the address tags. Addresses in NYC generally lack city, state, and country, and instead simply have housenumber, street, and postcode. This has been the common standard here since the building and address import in 2013. It's not wrong to add the other tags of course... but if you do, note that the addr:city tag value here would be "Brooklyn". The value of "New York" is only used within the borough of Manhattan. Happy mapping, J |
73707010 | almost 6 years ago | If the building will still be using that address (1487 Broadway) it's better keep the node there and just remove the tags specific for the cafe. Otherwise we lose the fact that this address is associated with this building. (This issue usually only comes up for corner buildings with an address on two streets, or for large muti-address buildings. Most others have address tags directly on the building itself.) Anyway I've resurrected this node and left just the base address tags from the original building import, all good. Happy mapping. j |
73764135 | almost 6 years ago | Hi ept -- what's up with these nonsense changeset comments? |
73730320 | almost 6 years ago | Hi, I believe from survey that this restaurant is 100% vegetarian, so the tag diet:vegetarian=only is correct. Is this untrue? |
73707010 | almost 6 years ago | Howdy AV... is this place just closed (ie, it might reopen as something else) or actually gone (ie,the building's been reconfigured without this storefront, or replaced with a new building altogether?) |
73631982 | almost 6 years ago | HI noneck, I've reverted this changeset with changeset 73958224. It looks like you were trying to add crosswalk info but accidentally modified the subway line. |
73011657 | almost 6 years ago | I've reverted in changeset 73931493. If there are still routing issues here, please let me know and we'll figure it out! J |
73011657 | almost 6 years ago | osm.org/way/60942164 really is =destination for motor vehicles -- It's not a public road but people can drive to the end of that segment and unload supplies for the picnic areas to the east. (I suppose =yes or =permissive would also work, but =destination feels most correct to me.) Motor vehicles can't go any further than that -- but people and bicycles can, and this is the primary use of the remainder of the road, though it can be used by vehicles with a permit. (Same with the other service roads around Litchfield Villa) Then there are the roads within the park forestry complex (44 West Drive), which are completely off limits except to park personnel. So it really is a mix of different access types. I'm not sure what weird results you were seeing, but here's what I'm seeing now: https://imgur.com/a/bw931DK
I'm planning to revert these access changes when I get a moment. J |
73357789 | almost 6 years ago | Great, I know some real estate developers around here are using some pretty hip names these days but I guess NYCHA's still a little more conservative! |
73011657 | almost 6 years ago | Hi Zverik -- You've changed a few service roads here to access=destination with the source listed as "Juno provider traces" but I don't see any sign of Juno activity on these roads. Last I surveyed here all of these were signed as authorized vehicles only -- has this changed? J |
73380147 | almost 6 years ago | Hi MustafaD, and welcome to OpenStreetMap! Question for you -- you seem to be naming everything you add in Manhattan some variation on "Manhattan Simit&Simit" -- two supermarkets in this changeset and also this cafe:
Offhand this seems odd that all of these things would have the same name... is this maybe a mistake? |
73357789 | almost 6 years ago | Hi Korzun, I see you changed the name of this NYCHA project from Ingersoll Houses to subTtile -- is this a mistake? |
73285420 | almost 6 years ago | Hi r_c -- I'm guessing the location of this bar is off? Probably should be somewhere around here: osm.org/node/6704294378#map=19/40.69704/-73.93470 (Looks like there's a brand new building there that hasn't been mapped yet... so much for "Old Timers"!) |
73157428 | almost 6 years ago | FYI I reverted the zip code to 11206. These guys have it wrong on their website -- 10221 isn't even a valid zip code! |