Hello Uwaina,
you contributed to this project of HOT by using RapiD with building contures recognized by AI. Please carefully check the features the AI proposes against the task imagery. In this case the AI seem to have used a different source of aerial imagery. The positions and sizes do not match to the task imagery which was BING. Please align and resizes the proposed buildings carefully with the project's imagery before uploading.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141533963

Hello r_su01,
thanks for contribution to this project of HOT in Brazil. You requested to get a feedback on your mapping.
Looking at this changeset it seems that you mapped the buildings very coarsely, e.g. drawing one conture around multiple buildings - instead please map buildings individually to get a better representation of the reality. Also remember to square the buildings you add (90° corners are mostly found with buildings) - here is a short video created by MissingMaps focussing on buildings: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&t=13s
Keep on mapping as every contribution is highly appreciated!
P.S. here is a nice visualization of this changeset: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141520410/
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141520410

P.S. you can see a nice visualization of your changeset here: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141519147/
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141519147

Hello,
thanks for contributing to OSM and this Humanitarian project in Brasil. You requested to get a feedback on your mapping. In general it is OK. The issues I spotted are often found with new mappers - but easiliy to avoid.
1. squaring building contures - buildings have mostly 90° corner - simply hit "q" key in the editor to square buildings (here is a video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o
2. shared nodes between buildings and / or buildings/highways. simply zoom in to avoid and disable the snapping by pressing "alt-key" while placing nodes - video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
Keep on mapping - as every contributions is highly appreciated!
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141519147

Hello arigu1 and welcome to OSM,
I just came across your contribution in Brasil. There are some issues you might improve for future edits: buildings are normally rectangular - so please square these before uploading (here is a video on this topic: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o
There were cases ob overlapping objects. A good method to avoid this is to zoom in to enable to draw objects close together without overlapping.
Finally you added a parking area (osm.org/way/1209449878) - what was your source for this decision - for me it looks more like a common building (fixed this).
Anyways: Keep on mapping and contributing to OSM and HOT projects.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141519932

Olá raldite e fitint,
restorei a história do node 2402980579 (osm.org/node/2402980579/history) e lo integri na contura de l'hospital. Tambem adicionei detalhes de contato, por exemplo "contact:website", "contact:phone".

Olá UPegasus,
eu agora estou re-validando uns projetos de HOT em Brasil e descubri as modificações no hospital em Encantado. Eu suporte totalmente a argumentacao de fitinit. Eu agora restorei a história do node 2154562427, e integrei-o no conture de l'hospital.

Hello UPegasus,
I am currently re-validating some HOT projects in Brazil and discovered the modifications to the hospital in Encantado. I fully support fitinit's argument. I have now restored the history of the node 2154562427, and integrated it into the conture de l'hospital.

Hello Ruixin Feng,
thanks for contributing. You have requested to get a feedback.
You spotted most of the buildings and used the correct tagging - very good.
In this area there were 3 circular shaped buildings. it seems as if you added each of the nodes manually. In the editors there is a simpler method: Just place 3 nodes on the boundary of the round building, right click on the object and select "make circular" in the context menue. After that the object will be perfectly circular.
The other thing you could improve to square the buildings - see here https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0

FYI: You also added 6 very simular objects (here is one: osm.org/way/1210558974). My interpretation is that they are just trucks with trailors that were temporarily parked when the imagery was shot. Checked against other available imagery. I have removed the objects.

Keep on mapping and contributing to OpenStreetMap and HOT.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141686670

typo: the correct project number is #hotosm-project-15602

typo: the correct project number is #hotosm-project-15602

typo: the correct project number is #hotosm-project-15602

typo: the correct project number is #hotosm-project-15602

Olá,
vias (ways) restauradas que tinham sido criadas antes do #hotosm-project-15602 e que deveriam ter sido modificadas / corrigidas sem perder a história dos objectos:
#575759860
#575759862
#575759940
Também foi devolvida a via (way) #1211698714, apesar de ter sido criada durante o projeto, mas pelo menos por um mapeador brasileiro, possivelmente local.
Espero que tudo está bem com este conjunto de alterações (changeset).

Hello Ruixin Feng,
thanks for contributing to OSM and this humanitarian project. You have requested to get a feedback on your changeset.
It seems that you could take more care about squaring the buildings you add. Relatively ease to do in the editors, but makes a big difference in the quality of the map we all together create!
Missing Maps has created a nice video focussing on why it is important to square the buildings and how to do it - here is the link.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
Kind regards
You could also see a visualisation of your edit here - I hope you can easily see what the issue was...
https://osmcha.org/changesets/141688757/
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141688757

Hello Ruixin Feng,
thanks for contributing to OSM and this humanitarian project. You have requested to get a feedback on your changeset.
It seems that you could take more care about squaring the buildings you add. Relatively ease to do in the editors, but makes a big difference in the quality of the map we all together create!
Missing Maps has created a nice video focussing on why it is important to square the buildings and how to do it - here is the link.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
Kind regards
You could also see a visualisation of your edit here - I hope you can easily see what the issue was...
https://osmcha.org/changesets/141688757/
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141688757

Hello Evgenii, thanks for contributing to this humanitarian project in Brasil. You have requested to get a feedback on your edits for this changeset.
You have correctly identified building and added these to the database. Apart from this I have detected issues that are often seen with new users - no problem at all. It is common good practise in OSM to map buildings individually normally without shared nodes. Missing Maps has prepared a nice video on this topic - maybe it is helpful for you:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
Kind regards.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141605466

Hello Lucy,
thanks for contributing on this humanitarian project in Brasil and welcome to OSM.
You have checked while uploading to get a feedback on your edits.
Here is my personal feedback. You spotted the buildings and mapped them as requested in the project's instructions.
One thing you should try to improve for future edits is to square the buildings you add. Here is a link to a youtube video prepared by MissingMaps organization which shows what I mean and how to solve and avoid this issue.
You are very welcome to return contributing to OSM and / or humanitarian projects.
Kind regards.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141787989

Olá fititnt e Everton,
acabei de descobrir a discussão sobre o conjunto de alterações e estava me perguntando se, e se sim, como o histórico do osm.org/node/5697078796/history poderia ser restaurado.
Restaurei o nó por meio do plug-in undelete do JOSM, movi-o para um dos cantos do edifício e o integrei ao contorno do edifício da prefeitura. Por fim, removi as tags específicas. Infelizmente, não vi nenhuma outra maneira de excluir o nó osm.org/node/11215654738/ que estava anteriormente nessa posição.
Ao editar, eu me orientei em: osm.wiki/Level0#Undelete_a_node
Caso contrário, o caminho osm.org/way/1210553264 já foi fornecido com tags adicionais úteis por @Everton. Muito obrigado por isso. Adicionei as tags contact:website, contact:phone e opening_hours.

@fititnt: Você poderia descrever o método usado para detectar POIs excluídos que os usuários excluíram?

Espero que você concorde com as alterações que fiz.

Hello Armando,
thanks for contributing. I just came across over some of the traffic_calming nodes you added in this changeset. Please remember that the must be part of the highway to be considered by navigation software.
Most of the nodes I found were not connected to the highways - fixed some of the issues.

Also please use more self speaking comments enabling others to quickly understand, what the focus of your edit was. In this case, e.g. "added nodes of traffic_calming along highways in Bahia". Here are some aspects why it is important to give good comments: osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/134633211

Hello hussein2,
welcome to OSM and thanks for your contribution. You have requested to get a feedback on your edits - here it is:
You mapped six buildings here. It was totally correct to use the generic tag "building=yes".
Unfortunately the shape of the building contures was not very accurate. In general most buildings have a rectangular shape meaning 90° angles in the corners. To achieve 90° angles simply press the "q"-key in the editor when the object is selected. Also try to get the orientation of the building correctly. I have corrected these issues, so just kind notes for future contributions that are always very welcome!.

Here is a visualization of your changeset https://osmcha.org/changesets/142106653/
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142106653