Thanks for the update. You should really consider improving the global wiki. It's really not clear the forward/backward keywords need to be at the end :)
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119272959

Are you having fun? there is no town, and you have been added consecutive residential, unclassified, and service segments in the middle of farms. I have reverted all your changes. Please respond here if you are genuinely interested in contributing to OSM, or your account and IP address will be reported.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119404682

Hi mueschel,

while the global wiki for destination contains no indications for translations,
the original proposal clearly states: destination:xxxxx:en or destination:xxxxxx:lang:en are the expected value for translations
osm.wiki/Proposed_features/Destination_details#destination:street
Or am I missing something ?

PS: Thailand is a small community, so keeping things simple would be the favored approach,

Best,
Julien
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119272959

Hi Otaru. I have updated the residential tag to apartments to reflect the global wiki valid values osm.wiki/Key:residential
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119222301

Great. thank you for your quality contributions!
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119157881

thanks for your contributions. what source did you use for the updated ref number? how did you decide to change the highway classification from primary to secondary ?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119157881

Thank you for your contributions!

In the future, please kindly split your changes into smaller geographical changesets. For more info: osm.wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119074602

Thanks for the fix. It would have been best though to rename the conflicting highway=service to highway=services, as it is normally used for gas stations in Thailand. osm.org/search?query=PTT%20thailand
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119063261

reported and reverted for geometry vandalism
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119005470

Not according to the Thai Wiki and the general consensus. Full details: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=75224
Users who repeatedly make conflicting changes, ignore community guidelines and warnings will be reported.
Autoisme, please respond asap to the forum link above.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/115870086

Not according to the Thai Wiki and the general consensus. Full details: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=75224
Users who repeatedly make conflicting changes, ignore community guidelines and warnings will be reported.
Autoisme, please respond asap to the forum link above.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/115870406

hey, thanks for your contributions! For future changes, please make sure to use "name" for the local name (most of the time Thai) and "name:en" for the English translation. If the local name is in English (e.g. restaurant), the Thai translation can go in "name:th", otherwise this "name:th" is optional. Thanks! Julien
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/118729582

Thank you for your contributions!

In the future, please kindly use a better changeset description so that other mappers can understand your changes:
osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/118427095

What source did you use for the street names?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/118332050

Please kindly use place=neighborhood for gated residential complex (mubans).
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/118332213

Thanks for the heads up. I will contact asap ESRI and submit a ticket to iD to include a warning to users when using the Custom Layer feature.

hi woodpeck. Good point. Data is listed and visible from local government amphoe.com and points to a deprecated public ESRI map. I didn't see any API key requirements, or any restriction in the License section, and I thought since ESRI Imagery is already supported by iD with the World_Imagery service, it would not be an issue, or was I wrong ?
Imagery page: https://www.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=30e5fe3149c34df1ba922e6f5bbf808f
Imagery url: https://{switch:services,server}.arcgisonline.com/arcgis/rest/services/World_Topo_Map/MapServer/tile/{zoom}/{y}/{x}

FYI, I removed the Raming tea "hamlet" node, because the housing is not a village but a government facility. I also moved the nearby Raming Tea cafe to the new location 1km north-east, as per my last visit. If you feel something is missing or incorrectly tagged, please feel free to correct it. Thanks, Julien

Hi fringo. Are these roads you reclassified as service within a private estate with gates and clear restricted access? If unsure, please kindly refer to the official wiki guidelines: osm.wiki/WikiProject_Thailand#Rough_guidelines_for_minor_highway_tag_decision-making_.28useful_in_most_cases.29
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117725254

Hi nitinatsangsit, what source did u use for the Mae Hong Son - Chiang Mai boundary? According to google and WorldStreetmap, a large section seems out of place by a large offset, so wanted to check with you first before improving it. Cheers, Julien