m86's Comments
Changeset | When | Comment |
---|---|---|
169315039 | 10 days ago | *Bel Air whoops |
154073433 | 10 months ago | If I had to guess, I would imagine it was the probable street number |
126485073 | over 1 year ago | shop=esoteric seems reasonable enough - will re-tag this node |
133152827 | over 1 year ago | I would imagine it was more or less a recommendation to double-check - I believe they were visible on street-side imagery, though, conceivably they could have been removed after (I would appraise that as unlikely) or were placed slightly off from locations imputed from front-facing street-view. |
117098958 | over 3 years ago | is classifying this land as shrubland proper for a (former [though, still 'filled land'] and not currently in use) landfill? (abandoned:landuse=landfill ?) |
66288955 | over 3 years ago | at a glance, it does not look particularly threatening - a swimming pool was removed, a house number was added, and minor nodes removed |
64883367 | about 4 years ago | I would imagine it means what it says - it was the former landuse here - the new location appears to be off of Appleton Road (ccfarmmuseum.org). While I don't remember exactly why I added the area, I would guess it would be to personally keep track of (current or non) 'park' landuse within Cecil County.. so, yes, it probably should be removed. |
103123305 | over 4 years ago | I have no idea how to navigate turn-restrictions here.. |
73704478 | about 5 years ago | Noted. |
66111120 | over 5 years ago | I've changed the tag to 'socket:type1_combo', which is probably accurate in this instance. I have not *confirmed* this, but I'll confirm this in person when able.. |
74487896 | almost 6 years ago | Regarding the trail by the water deleted as part of this changeset - It's still part of the current trail map, despite the fact that it was officially closed off due to erosion - I had already marked it as 'access=no' to indicate this. I don't know the current status of the trail or its future. |
74782804 | almost 6 years ago | *US 40 |
74459852 | almost 6 years ago | It probably would have been preferable to keep the geometry for the removed roads and re-tag as highway=proposed (or something along those lines). I do not currently know how to revert.. |
74275448 | almost 6 years ago | lines*, as I apparently cannot spell |
73253099 | almost 6 years ago | The outgoing mail tag really isn't important - omitting it and just tagging it as a letter box would be fine |
73253099 | almost 6 years ago | This specific one (node 6701735742) is a shared private cluster mailbox for tenants in a section of this shopping center - there are multiple addresses associated with it, though, also a slot for outgoing mail. I was not sure what the best way of tagging it would be, but I would consider it more so a letter box than a post box (high capacity, public). |
72244393 | about 6 years ago | Deleting the company-specific tags may be the better option - it would keep the address and suite for future tenants, and general node history |
51496587 | about 6 years ago | Noted. Some additional county parks (primarily rec. fields) are also tagged recreation_ground as well - I'll re-tag them. |
62502966 | over 6 years ago | Per the Harford Glen rules, the trails are strictly for walking (and for those capable of it, probably private use for the maintenance crew) . I'll re-tag the paths at some point to more tersely note this, but I'm not done in this area.. and it's open to the public again in April. |
62296458 | almost 7 years ago | Hmm.. well, it would seem this broke the region further? If someone could revert the offending edits (including this one) in this region and fix this, it would be appreciated. |