開放街圖標誌 OpenStreetMap 開放街圖

變更集 評論
169315039 10 天前

*Bel Air

whoops

154073433 10 個月前

If I had to guess, I would imagine it was the probable street number

126485073 超過1年前

shop=esoteric seems reasonable enough - will re-tag this node

133152827 超過1年前

I would imagine it was more or less a recommendation to double-check - I believe they were visible on street-side imagery, though, conceivably they could have been removed after (I would appraise that as unlikely) or were placed slightly off from locations imputed from front-facing street-view.

117098958 超過3年前

is classifying this land as shrubland proper for a (former [though, still 'filled land'] and not currently in use) landfill? (abandoned:landuse=landfill ?)

66288955 超過3年前

at a glance, it does not look particularly threatening - a swimming pool was removed, a house number was added, and minor nodes removed

64883367 約 4 年前

I would imagine it means what it says - it was the former landuse here - the new location appears to be off of Appleton Road (ccfarmmuseum.org). While I don't remember exactly why I added the area, I would guess it would be to personally keep track of (current or non) 'park' landuse within Cecil County.. so, yes, it probably should be removed.

103123305 超過4年前

I have no idea how to navigate turn-restrictions here..

73704478 約 5 年前

Noted.

66111120 超過5年前

I've changed the tag to 'socket:type1_combo', which is probably accurate in this instance. I have not *confirmed* this, but I'll confirm this in person when able..

74487896 將近 6 年前

Regarding the trail by the water deleted as part of this changeset - It's still part of the current trail map, despite the fact that it was officially closed off due to erosion - I had already marked it as 'access=no' to indicate this. I don't know the current status of the trail or its future.

74782804 將近 6 年前

*US 40

74459852 將近 6 年前

It probably would have been preferable to keep the geometry for the removed roads and re-tag as highway=proposed (or something along those lines). I do not currently know how to revert..

74275448 將近 6 年前

lines*, as I apparently cannot spell

73253099 將近 6 年前

The outgoing mail tag really isn't important - omitting it and just tagging it as a letter box would be fine

73253099 將近 6 年前

This specific one (node 6701735742) is a shared private cluster mailbox for tenants in a section of this shopping center - there are multiple addresses associated with it, though, also a slot for outgoing mail. I was not sure what the best way of tagging it would be, but I would consider it more so a letter box than a post box (high capacity, public).

72244393 約 6 年前

Deleting the company-specific tags may be the better option - it would keep the address and suite for future tenants, and general node history

51496587 約 6 年前

Noted. Some additional county parks (primarily rec. fields) are also tagged recreation_ground as well - I'll re-tag them.

62502966 超過6年前

Per the Harford Glen rules, the trails are strictly for walking (and for those capable of it, probably private use for the maintenance crew) . I'll re-tag the paths at some point to more tersely note this, but I'm not done in this area.. and it's open to the public again in April.

62296458 將近 7 年前

Hmm.. well, it would seem this broke the region further? If someone could revert the offending edits (including this one) in this region and fix this, it would be appreciated.