Just read it at the tagging ML and cannot help but have to share it with you: Tag:natural=cloud
Hopefully some interested people will comment and vote on it – and the uninterested will use it for mapping.
Just read it at the tagging ML and cannot help but have to share it with you: Tag:natural=cloud
Hopefully some interested people will comment and vote on it – and the uninterested will use it for mapping.
토론
2014년 4월 1일 22:33에 DaCor님의 의견
Nice work
Added my comments to the discussion
2014년 4월 2일 04:42에 z-dude님의 의견
I disagree with the idea of tagging clouds.
People have already tagged the limits of the hires imagery in the past, but in some cases, the imagery has been updated, but the relations have not been updated.
To a casual mapper, updating relations can be a confusing task, especially on odd shapes or relations with many parts.
An example - high res imagery boundary in Mali osm.org/relation/2770026#map=6/19.280/0.780
I’d rather see ‘fixme’ tags on roads which have been interpolated under cloudy imagery.
2014년 4월 3일 10:05에 Pieren님의 의견
For history, just remember that the wiki page has been create a 1st april -> April Fool’s joke
2014년 4월 5일 16:21에 RoadLessTravelled님의 의견
Yes, I’m forever wishing I could have my GPS tell me to turn right at the next cumulo nimbus…